MedElevator Войти в исследования
← Поиск публикаций

DOI 10.1016/j.jacep.2023.08.005

Медицинская библиотека · JACC. Clinical electrophysiology · 2023

50-W vs 40-W During High-Power Short-Duration Ablation for Paroxysmal Atrial Fibrillation: A Multicenter Prospective Study.

Costea Alexandru, Diaz Juan Carlos, Osorio Jose, Matos Carlos D, Hoyos Carolina, Goyal Sandeep, Te Charles, D'Souza Benjamin, Rastogi Mohit, Lopez-Cabanillas Nestor, Ibanez Laura C, Thorne Christopher, Varley Allyson L, Zei Paul C, Sauer William H, Romero Jorge E

Многоцентровое исследованиеСтатьяПоддержка исследования: вне правительства СШАПеревод пока не подготовлен

Аннотация

BACKGROUND

High-power short-duration (HPSD) radiofrequency ablation of atrial fibrillation (AF) increases first-pass pulmonary vein isolation (PVI) and freedom from atrial arrhythmias while decreasing procedural time. However, the optimal power setting in terms of safety and efficacy has not been determined.

OBJECTIVES

This study compared the procedural characteristics and clinical outcomes of 50-W vs 40-W during HPSD ablation of paroxysmal AF.

METHODS

Patients from the REAL-AF prospective multicenter registry (Real-World Experience of Catheter Ablation for Treatment of Symptomatic Paroxysmal and Persistent Atrial Fibrillation) undergoing HPSD ablation of paroxysmal AF, either using 50-W or 40-W, were included. The primary efficacy outcome was freedom from all-atrial arrhythmias. The primary safety outcome was the occurrence of any procedural complication at 12 months. Secondary outcomes included procedural characteristics, AF-related symptoms, and the occurrence of transient ischemic attack or stroke at 12 months.

RESULTS

A total of 383 patients were included. Freedom from all-atrial arrhythmias at 12 months was 80.7% in the 50-W group and 77.3% in the 40-W group (Log-rank P = 0.387). The primary safety outcome occurred in 3.7% of patients in the 50-W group vs 2.8% in the 40-W group (P = 0.646). The 50-W group had a higher rate of first-pass PVI (82.3% vs 76.2%; P = 0.040) as well as shorter procedural (67 minutes [IQR: 54-87.5 minutes] vs 93 minutes [IQR: 80.5-111 minutes]; P < 0.001) and radiofrequency ablation times (15 minutes [IQR: 11.4-20 minutes] vs 27 minutes [IQR: 21.5-34.6 minutes]; P < 0.001) than the 40-W group.

CONCLUSIONS

There was no significant difference in freedom from all-atrial arrhythmias or procedural safety outcomes between 50-W and 40-W during HPSD ablation of paroxysmal AF. The use of 50-W was associated with a higher rate of first-pass PVI as well as shorter procedural times.

Для цитирования: Costea Alexandru, Diaz Juan Carlos, Osorio Jose, Matos Carlos D, Hoyos Carolina, Goyal Sandeep, Te Charles, D'Souza Benjamin, Rastogi Mohit, Lopez-Cabanillas Nestor, Ibanez Laura C, Thorne Christopher, Varley Allyson L, Zei Paul C, Sauer William H, Romero Jorge E. 50-W vs 40-W During High-Power Short-Duration Ablation for Paroxysmal Atrial Fibrillation: A Multicenter Prospective Study.. JACC. Clinical electrophysiology. 2023. DOI: 10.1016/j.jacep.2023.08.005.

Предметные рубрики MeSH

Подготовка и перевод публикации
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…

История · было → стало

Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.

Тип публикации указан по данным источника. Уровень доказательности автоматически не присваивается.