DOI 10.1016/j.wneu.2017.03.028
Treatment of Large and Giant Middle Cerebral Artery Aneurysms: Risk Factors for Unfavorable Outcomes.
Аннотация
OBJECTIVE
This study aimed to assess the clinical and radiologic outcomes after neurosurgical treatment of large and giant aneurysms of the middle cerebral artery (MCA). In addition, we aimed to identify risk factors for unfavorable outcomes.
METHODS
This retrospective study included 105 patients with 106 large or giant MCA aneurysms treated with neurosurgical methods, including microsurgery and endovascular treatment, over a 15-year period.
RESULTS
The mean aneurysm size was 15.3 ± 7.1 mm. Ten (9.4%) were giant aneurysms. The MCA bifurcation was the most common aneurysm site, followed by the MCA trunk and distal MCA. Aneurysm clipping was the most common treatment method, followed by clipping or trapping with bypass surgery and endovascular treatment. However, acute cerebral infarction was the most common complication (16.0%), poor outcomes (modified Rankin Scale score, 3-6) developed in 12.3% of aneurysms after treatment, and 6.6% of treated aneurysms needed retreatment. Multivariate analysis showed that independent risk factors for acute cerebral infarction after treatment were aneurysms located on the MCA trunk and 2 or more underlying diseases. Initial presentation with subarachnoid hemorrhage and complications during treatment were independent risk factors for poor outcomes. In addition, endosaccular coiling was an independent risk factor for retreatment.
CONCLUSIONS
Neurosurgical management should be considered a priority for large and giant MCA aneurysms because of the high rupture rate and clinical symptoms. However, treatment outcomes remain unsatisfactory. Therefore, tailored management with consideration of risk factors for unfavorable outcomes should be implemented.
Предметные рубрики MeSH
Подготовка и перевод публикации
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Ошибки и ограничения
История · было → стало
Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.
Тип публикации указан по данным источника. Уровень доказательности автоматически не присваивается.