MedElevator Войти в исследования
← Поиск публикаций

DOI 10.1016/j.wneu.2016.08.009

Медицинская библиотека · World neurosurgery · 2016

Short-Term Outcome of Clipping Versus Coiling of Ruptured Intracranial Aneurysms Treated by Dual-Trained Cerebrovascular Surgeon: Single-Institution Experience.

Zanaty Mario, Chalouhi Nohra, Starke Robert M, Daou Badih, Todd Michael, Bayman Emine, Torner James, Hasan David

Сравнительное исследованиеСтатьяПеревод пока не подготовлен

Аннотация

OBJECTIVE

Studies that showed endovascular coiling of ruptured intracranial aneurysms (RAs) to be superior to microsurgical clipping have compared dedicated endovascular interventionists versus open cerebrovascular surgeons. This is the first study to evaluate outcomes of coiling versus clipping of RAs treated by a dual-trained cerebrovascular surgeon using a specific intervention protocol.

METHODS

The prospectively maintained database was reviewed for all patients with RAs undergoing endovascular coiling (± stenting) or clipping by the senior author (dual-trained vascular neurosurgeon) between July 2010 and April 2015.

RESULTS

Of the 252 patients identified, 70 underwent clipping and 182 underwent endovascular treatment. The mean and median time to last follow-up were 179.6 and 176.5 days in the endovascular cohort and 203.9 and 154.0 days in the surgical cohort. There was no difference in age, gender, World Federation of Neurosurgical Societies grade and Fisher grade, mean aneurysm size, and length of stay in the hospital/intensive care unit. Clipping had a higher proportion of middle cerebral artery aneurysms (37.1% vs. 8.8%; P < 0.001) and a lower proportion of aneurysms in the remaining locations (P < 0.001). 34.5% of the endovascular cohort and 32.9% of the clipping cohort were discharged home. There was no difference in modified Rankin Scale score at first or latest follow-up. Most had no significant disability. Mortality of endovascular treatment was 13.2% compared with 10.0% in clipping, and 16.5% versus 18.6% at the latest follow-up (both nonsignificant). The rate of conversion from coiling to clipping was 25.0%.

CONCLUSIONS

RA treatment should be individualized, with clipping and coiling being 2 complementary arms. Assessment of patient and aneurysm characteristics along with the advantages of both techniques provides an optimal therapeutic modality.

Для цитирования: Zanaty Mario, Chalouhi Nohra, Starke Robert M, Daou Badih, Todd Michael, Bayman Emine, Torner James, Hasan David. Short-Term Outcome of Clipping Versus Coiling of Ruptured Intracranial Aneurysms Treated by Dual-Trained Cerebrovascular Surgeon: Single-Institution Experience.. World neurosurgery. 2016. DOI: 10.1016/j.wneu.2016.08.009.

Предметные рубрики MeSH

Подготовка и перевод публикации
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…

История · было → стало

Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.

Тип публикации указан по данным источника. Уровень доказательности автоматически не присваивается.