MedElevator Войти в исследования
← Поиск публикаций

DOI 10.1177/0300060521999549

Медицинская библиотека · The Journal of international medical research · 2021

An updated meta-analysis: repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation for treating tinnitus.

Yin Lu, Chen Xiao, Lu Xingang, An Yun, Zhang Tao, Yan Juntao

СтатьяМетаанализПеревод пока не подготовлен

Аннотация

OBJECTIVE

To undertake an updated meta-analysis to obtain more evidence from randomized controlled trials (RCTs) to assess the effect of repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation (rTMS) for the treatment of tinnitus.

METHODS

PubMed®, Embase®, Web of Science, Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews, CBM, CNKI and Wanfang were searched for RCTs from inception up to March 2020. Studies meeting the eligibility criteria were included in the meta-analysis. The mean difference was calculated and the effect size was evaluated using a Z test.

RESULTS

The analysis included 12 randomized sham-controlled clinical trials with a total of 717 participants. Active rTMS was superior to sham rTMS in terms of the short-term and long-term effects (6 months) on the tinnitus handicap inventory scores, but an immediate effect was not significant. There was no significant immediate effect on the tinnitus questionnaire (TQ) and Beck depression inventory (BDI) scores.

CONCLUSIONS

This meta-analysis demonstrated that rTMS improved tinnitus-related symptoms, but the TQ and BDI scores demonstrated little immediate benefit. Future research should be undertaken on large samples in multi-centre settings with longer follow-up durations.

Для цитирования: Yin Lu, Chen Xiao, Lu Xingang, An Yun, Zhang Tao, Yan Juntao. An updated meta-analysis: repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation for treating tinnitus.. The Journal of international medical research. 2021. DOI: 10.1177/0300060521999549.

Предметные рубрики MeSH

Подготовка и перевод публикации
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…

История · было → стало

Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.

Тип публикации указан по данным источника. Уровень доказательности автоматически не присваивается.