An Evaluation of the Relationship between Retinal Nerve Fiber Thickness, Cochlear Nerve Thickness, the Level of Tinnitus, and Hearing Loss in Unilateral Tinnitus Patients.

BACKGROUND

In this study, optic coherence tomography (OCT) examination was performed to check whether there was any interaction between ophthalmic axonal structures in unilateral tinnitus patients, and the relationship between optic nerve thickness and cochlear nerve thickness was evaluated.

OBJECTIVE

The aim of the study was to evaluate the relatioship between hearing loss, tinnitus, and nerve thicknesses.

STUDY

DESIGN

Prospective study.

SETTING

Tertiary referral university hospital.

PATIENTS: The study included 88 patients with unilateral tinnitus, for which no organic cause could be found in physical examination, psychiatric evaluation, or with imaging methods. Study groups were formed of the tinnitus side and control groups were formed of the healthy side as follows: Group 1 (Non-tinnitus side normal hearing values - n = 30), Group 2 (non-tinnitus side minimal hearing loss - n = 27), Group 3 (non-tinnitus side moderate hearing loss - n = 31), Group 4 (tinnitus side normal hearing values - n = 25), Group 5 (tinnitus side minimal hearing loss - n = 25), and Group 6 (tinnitus side moderate hearing loss - n = 38).

INTERVENTION: Retinal nerve fiber layer (RNFL) thickness was evaluated with OCT, and the cochlear nerve cross-sectional area was evaluated with MRI.

MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: RNFL measurements were taken with OCT from the subfoveal area (RNFL-SF) and 1.5 mm temporal to the fovea (RNFL-T µm) and nasal (RNFL-N µm) sectors. On MRI, 3 measurements were taken along the nerve from the cerebellopontine angle as far as the internal auditory canal, and the mean value of these 3 measurements was calculated.

RESULTS

When the groups were evaluated in respect of cochlear nerve thickness, a significant difference was seen between Group 1 and both the groups with hearing loss and the tinnitus groups. In the subgroup analysis, a statistically significant difference was determined between Group 1 and Groups 3, 4, 5, and 6 (p = 0.013, p = 0.003, p < 0.001, and p < 0.001, respectively). When the groups were evaluated in respect of the RNFL-SF (µm), RNFL-T (µm), and RNFL-N (µm) values, the differences were determined to be statistically significant (p < 0.001 for all). In the correlation analysis, a negative correlation was determined between hearing loss and cochlear nerve diameter (r: -0.184, p = 0.014), and RNFL-N (r: -0.272, p < 0.001) and between tinnitus and cochlear nerve diameter (r: -0.536, p < 0.001), and RNFL-T (r: -0.222, p < 0.009).

CONCLUSION

The study results clearly showed a relationship between cochlear nerve fiber thickness and hearing loss and the severity of tinnitus in cases with unilateral tinnitus and that there could be neurodegenerative factors in the disease etiology. A similar relationship seen with the RNFL supports the study hypothesis.