MedElevator Войти в исследования
← Поиск публикаций

DOI 10.1159/000536463

Медицинская библиотека · Case reports in neurology · 2024

Highly Active Relapsing-Remitting Multiple Sclerosis with Neurofibromatosis Type 1: Radiological Aspects and Therapeutic Challenges - Case Report.

Lemonaris Marios, Kleopa Kleopas A

Клинический случайСтатьяПеревод пока не подготовлен

Аннотация

INTRODUCTION

Multiple sclerosis (MS) is an autoimmune neurodegenerative disease which can rarely co-exist with neurofibromatosis 1 (NF1), a neurocutaneous inherited disorder that predisposes to oncogenesis. Patients who suffer from both conditions can be challenging cases for clinicians, as clinical symptoms and radiological findings may overlap, while MS immune-modifying treatments could further increase the risk of oncogenesis.

CASE PRESENTATION: In this study, we describe the case of a 27-year-old woman who presented with signs and symptoms of optic neuritis and was then diagnosed with both MS and NF1. As the patient continued to experience MS relapses despite initial interferon-beta treatment, she was subsequently switched to natalizumab and responded well.

CONCLUSION

This case illustrates how MRI lesion differentiation with the co-existence of MS and NF1 can be difficult due to overlaps in lesion characteristics, while treatment decisions can be challenging mainly due to scarce data on the oncogenic risk of MS immunomodulary therapies. Therefore, clinicians need to balance out the risk of malignancy development with the risk of progressive neurological disability when treating such patients.

Для цитирования: Lemonaris Marios, Kleopa Kleopas A. Highly Active Relapsing-Remitting Multiple Sclerosis with Neurofibromatosis Type 1: Radiological Aspects and Therapeutic Challenges - Case Report.. Case reports in neurology. 2024. DOI: 10.1159/000536463.
Подготовка и перевод публикации
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…

История · было → стало

Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.

Тип публикации указан по данным источника. Уровень доказательности автоматически не присваивается.