BMC surgery · 2025
Allograft tolerance after adult living donor liver transplantation: a case-control study.
СтатьяНазвание и аннотация: Перевод в очереди
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…
Ошибки и ограничения
История · было → стало
Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.
Habl Mohamed S, Emara Moataz Maher, Zayed Reham A, Sultan Ahmed M, Elsabagh Ahmed, Elsaid Ahmed Marwan, Abdel-Khalek Ehab E, El-Saadany Mohamed M, Wahab Mohamed Abdel, Shehta Ahmed
Аннотация
BACKGROUND: To investigate the incidence and potential predictors of immune tolerance among adult living donor liver transplant (LDLT) recipients.
METHODS: This case-control study included adult recipients who underwent LDLT between May 2004 and January 2018, with at least a 5-year follow-up after LDLT. We divided the study recipients into two groups: Group 1 (Tolerance Group) included recipients who achieved operational or prope tolerance for at least one year; Group 2 (Control Group) included recipients who did not achieve tolerance. We used logistic regression analysis to study the potential predictors of tolerance after LDLT.
RESULTS: We included 368 recipients, 275 (74.7%) in Group 1 and 93 (25.3%) in Group 2. Operational tolerance occurred in 13/275 (4.7%) recipients and prope tolerance in 262/275 (95.3%) recipients. Age was significantly higher in Group 1. The median time for tolerance among the study recipients was 60 months (36-168). During follow-up, Group 1 showed lower serum levels of bilirubin, liver enzymes, alkaline phosphatase, and gamma-glutamyl transferase. Group 1 had a lower incidence of acute cellular rejection (ACR), recurrent viral hepatitis, and biliary complications. Logistic regression identified preoperative MELD, indication for LDLT, ACR, recurrent viral hepatitis, and biliary complications as significant predictors for allograft tolerance after LDLT.
CONCLUSION: Allograft tolerance occurred in 74.7% of this cohort. We suggest that the MELD score, indication for LT, ACR, recurrent viral hepatitis, and biliary complications are predictors of allograft tolerance after LDLT.
METHODS: This case-control study included adult recipients who underwent LDLT between May 2004 and January 2018, with at least a 5-year follow-up after LDLT. We divided the study recipients into two groups: Group 1 (Tolerance Group) included recipients who achieved operational or prope tolerance for at least one year; Group 2 (Control Group) included recipients who did not achieve tolerance. We used logistic regression analysis to study the potential predictors of tolerance after LDLT.
RESULTS: We included 368 recipients, 275 (74.7%) in Group 1 and 93 (25.3%) in Group 2. Operational tolerance occurred in 13/275 (4.7%) recipients and prope tolerance in 262/275 (95.3%) recipients. Age was significantly higher in Group 1. The median time for tolerance among the study recipients was 60 months (36-168). During follow-up, Group 1 showed lower serum levels of bilirubin, liver enzymes, alkaline phosphatase, and gamma-glutamyl transferase. Group 1 had a lower incidence of acute cellular rejection (ACR), recurrent viral hepatitis, and biliary complications. Logistic regression identified preoperative MELD, indication for LDLT, ACR, recurrent viral hepatitis, and biliary complications as significant predictors for allograft tolerance after LDLT.
CONCLUSION: Allograft tolerance occurred in 74.7% of this cohort. We suggest that the MELD score, indication for LT, ACR, recurrent viral hepatitis, and biliary complications are predictors of allograft tolerance after LDLT.