MedElevator Войти в исследования
← Поиск публикаций

DOI 10.1007/s00038-009-7074-0

Медицинская библиотека · International journal of public health · 2009

Domestic violence: variation in case-management by the general practitioner in Belgium.

Bossuyt Nathalie, van Casteren Viviane

СтатьяПеревод пока не подготовлен

Аннотация

OBJECTIVES

to describe the medical interventions and referrals carried out by the general practitioner (GP) when taking care of victims and to quantify the between-physician variability in management of domestic violence.

METHODS

A nationwide sentinel network of 150 general practitioners, covering 1.5 % of the Belgian population, registered in 2002-2004 all episodes of domestic violence for which they were consulted, via paper registration forms. A multilevel analysis was carried out by fitting a random effects logistic regression model for every intervention/referral.

RESULTS

The most frequent interventions of the GP were providing a certificate of injury (54 %), and making an appointment for a next visit (33 %). Half of the patients were referred or hospitalised upon the first consultation, most frequently they were advised to go to the police (17 %) or referred to a psychologist or psychiatrist (11 %). The intra cluster correlation coefficient (ICC) of the interventions varied between 11 % and 39 % and the median odds ratios between 1,82 and 3,96.

CONCLUSIONS

GP consultations for domestic violence are frequent and involve considerable between-physician variability in care.

Для цитирования: Bossuyt Nathalie, van Casteren Viviane. Domestic violence: variation in case-management by the general practitioner in Belgium.. International journal of public health. 2009. DOI: 10.1007/s00038-009-7074-0.

Предметные рубрики MeSH

Подготовка и перевод публикации
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…

История · было → стало

Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.

Тип публикации указан по данным источника. Уровень доказательности автоматически не присваивается.