Ugeskrift for laeger · 2006
[Treatment of stress, sick leave and occupational stability].
Аннотация на английскомСтатьяНазвание и аннотация: Перевод пока не подготовлен
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…
Ошибки и ограничения
История · было → стало
Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.
Lander Flemming, Friche Claus, Knudsen Hugo
Аннотация
INTRODUCTION: The aim was to describe a rehabilitation process of individuals with stress-related adjustment disorders and analysing the prognostic impact of certain individual factors with sick leave and work resumption as outcome.
METHODS: A retrospective cohort from the period 1996-2004 was conducted by means of an audit of 220 files of patients who have visited an occupational health care unit.
RESULTS: A still increasing number of patients, mainly working in public health and welfare institutions, were admitted during the nine year study period. The average rehabilitation duration was 144 days (range: 3-689). After that period a decrease in the number of individuals on sick leave was found, and a total of 62% had returned to work or remained in work. The only individual predictor having negative impact on ability to work was psychopharmacologic drug treatment (Odds Ratio: 0.43: 0.23-0.81), whereas somatic drug treatment, age, gender, skill, workplace, matrimony, and smoking all were without any significant influence on work ability.
CONCLUSION: This study shows that an occupational rehabilitation process of patients with stress-related adjustment disorders seems to improve ability to resume work, but a minor group, especially those in psychopharmacologic drug treatment, need prolonged rehabilitation. More rigorous study design is needed to confirm these findings.
METHODS: A retrospective cohort from the period 1996-2004 was conducted by means of an audit of 220 files of patients who have visited an occupational health care unit.
RESULTS: A still increasing number of patients, mainly working in public health and welfare institutions, were admitted during the nine year study period. The average rehabilitation duration was 144 days (range: 3-689). After that period a decrease in the number of individuals on sick leave was found, and a total of 62% had returned to work or remained in work. The only individual predictor having negative impact on ability to work was psychopharmacologic drug treatment (Odds Ratio: 0.43: 0.23-0.81), whereas somatic drug treatment, age, gender, skill, workplace, matrimony, and smoking all were without any significant influence on work ability.
CONCLUSION: This study shows that an occupational rehabilitation process of patients with stress-related adjustment disorders seems to improve ability to resume work, but a minor group, especially those in psychopharmacologic drug treatment, need prolonged rehabilitation. More rigorous study design is needed to confirm these findings.