Reliability and effectiveness of screening for hearing loss in high risk neonates.
Аннотация
OBJECTIVE
To establish the reliability and effectiveness of screening for hearing loss by brainstem auditory evoked potential testing in high risk neonates.
DESIGN
Seven year investigation of newborn babies admitted to a special care baby unit and monitored through a regional children's audiology unit.
SETTING
Special care baby unit and children's audiology department, Belfast.
SUBJECTS: 405 neonates admitted to the baby unit, during 1 October 1982 to 31 March 1987.
MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Presence of hearing impairment, type and severity of hearing impairment, mortality.
RESULTS
85 children failed the screening test, 62 of whom were followed up. Five children had severe bilateral sensorineural impairment and 12 had conductive impairment requiring surgical intervention. A further 18 had severe neurological disorder detected. The sensitivity of screening was 100% and specificity was 88%. If the procedure was introduced into routine clinical practice the mean age at diagnosis for all children with severe perinatal hearing impairment would be 11 (median 1) months. The mean age at diagnosis with the health visitor screening service was 23 (19) months (difference 10 months, 95% confidence interval 6 to 16 months; p < 0.0001).
CONCLUSION
Screening for hearing loss in high risk neonates is highly reliable and cost effective. It also provides valuable neurophysiological information. Routine testing of these infants would result in over half of all children with severe bilateral perinatal sensorineural hearing impairment being identified by 2 months of age. This would make an important contribution to the habilitation of this socially, emotionally, and educationally vulnerable group.
Предметные рубрики MeSH
Подготовка и перевод публикации
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Ошибки и ограничения
История · было → стало
Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.
Тип публикации указан по данным источника. Уровень доказательности автоматически не присваивается.