Journal of the American Academy of Dermatology · 2020
The dermoscopic inverse approach significantly improves the accuracy of human readers for lentigo maligna diagnosis.
Сравнительное исследованиеСтатьяНазвание и аннотация: Перевод пока не подготовлен
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…
Ошибки и ограничения
История · было → стало
Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.
Lallas Aimilios, Lallas Konstantinos, Tschandl Philipp, Kittler Harald, Apalla Zoe, Longo Caterina, Argenziano Giuseppe
Аннотация
BACKGROUND: A recently introduced dermoscopic method for the diagnosis of early lentigo maligna (LM) is based on the absence of prevalent patterns of pigmented actinic keratosis and solar lentigo/flat seborrheic keratosis. We term this the inverse approach.
OBJECTIVE: To determine whether training on the inverse approach increases the diagnostic accuracy of readers compared to classic pattern analysis.
METHODS: We used clinical and dermoscopic images of histopathologically diagnosed LMs, pigmented actinic keratoses, and solar lentigo/flat seborrheic keratoses. Participants in a dermoscopy masterclass classified the lesions at baseline and after training on pattern analysis and the inverse approach. We compared their diagnostic performance among the 3 timepoints and to that of a trained convolutional neural network.
RESULTS: The mean sensitivity for LM without training was 51.5%; after training on pattern analysis, it increased to 56.7%; and after learning the inverse approach, it increased to 83.6%. The mean proportions of correct answers at the 3 timepoints were 62.1%, 65.5, and 78.5%. The percentages of readers outperforming the convolutional neural network were 6.4%, 15.4%, and 53.9%, respectively.
LIMITATIONS: The experimental setting and the inclusion of histopathologically diagnosed lesions only.
CONCLUSIONS: The inverse approach, added to the classic pattern analysis, significantly improves the sensitivity of human readers for early LM diagnosis.
OBJECTIVE: To determine whether training on the inverse approach increases the diagnostic accuracy of readers compared to classic pattern analysis.
METHODS: We used clinical and dermoscopic images of histopathologically diagnosed LMs, pigmented actinic keratoses, and solar lentigo/flat seborrheic keratoses. Participants in a dermoscopy masterclass classified the lesions at baseline and after training on pattern analysis and the inverse approach. We compared their diagnostic performance among the 3 timepoints and to that of a trained convolutional neural network.
RESULTS: The mean sensitivity for LM without training was 51.5%; after training on pattern analysis, it increased to 56.7%; and after learning the inverse approach, it increased to 83.6%. The mean proportions of correct answers at the 3 timepoints were 62.1%, 65.5, and 78.5%. The percentages of readers outperforming the convolutional neural network were 6.4%, 15.4%, and 53.9%, respectively.
LIMITATIONS: The experimental setting and the inclusion of histopathologically diagnosed lesions only.
CONCLUSIONS: The inverse approach, added to the classic pattern analysis, significantly improves the sensitivity of human readers for early LM diagnosis.
Предметные рубрики MeSH
AdultAgedDatasets as TopicDermatologistsDermoscopyDiagnosis, DifferentialEarly Detection of CancerFemaleHumansHutchinson's Melanotic FreckleImage Processing, Computer-AssistedKeratosis, ActinicKeratosis, SeborrheicMaleMiddle AgedNeural Networks, ComputerSensitivity and SpecificitySkinSkin NeoplasmsYoung Adult