MedElevator Войти в исследования
← Поиск публикаций

DOI 10.12998/wjcc.v9.i36.11406

Медицинская библиотека · World journal of clinical cases · 2021

Inguinal endometriosis: Ten case reports and review of literature.

Li Shu-Hong, Sun Heng-Zi, Li Wei-Hua, Wang Shu-Zhen

Клинический случайСтатьяПеревод пока не подготовлен

Аннотация

BACKGROUND

To describe the characteristics, diagnosis and surgical treatment of inguinal endometriosis (IEM).

CASE SUMMARY: We retrospectively analyzed 10 patients diagnosed with IEM at Beijing Chao-Yang Hospital from 2011 to 2019. Relevant features, symptoms, images, surgical treatment, hormonal therapy and follow-up were collected and discussed. A total of 10 cases of IEM diagnosed by surgery and pathology were characterized by a lesion on the right side (9/11); five patients had symptoms related to the menstrual cycle, and only 3 patients were clearly diagnosed before surgery. Ultrasonography was of little assistance in confirming the diagnosis, but magnetic resonance imaging showed specific, high-intensity patterns. Anatomically, most of the IEM lesions were located in the extraperitoneal ligament (10/11); nine patients had inguinal hernias (IH), five had concurrent or prior pelvic endometriosis, and four had infertility. The clinical results from extensive resection were satisfactory.

CONCLUSION

IEM is an extremely rare condition that can easily be misdiagnosed prior to surgery. A right IH may contribute to the formation of right-sided IEM, and extensive resection involving the round ligament and hernia sac is essential to prevent recurrence.

Для цитирования: Li Shu-Hong, Sun Heng-Zi, Li Wei-Hua, Wang Shu-Zhen. Inguinal endometriosis: Ten case reports and review of literature.. World journal of clinical cases. 2021. DOI: 10.12998/wjcc.v9.i36.11406.
Подготовка и перевод публикации
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…

История · было → стало

Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.

Тип публикации указан по данным источника. Уровень доказательности автоматически не присваивается.