MedElevator Войти в исследования
← Поиск публикаций

DOI 10.1016/j.brs.2020.11.014

Медицинская библиотека · Brain stimulation · 2020

Non-invasive neuromodulation for tinnitus: A meta-analysis and modeling studies.

Lefebvre-Demers Mathilde, Doyon Nicolas, Fecteau Shirley

СтатьяМетаанализПоддержка исследования: вне правительства СШАОбзорПеревод пока не подготовлен

Аннотация

BACKGROUND

Patients with tinnitus often have poor quality of life, as well as severe anxiety and depression. New approaches to treat tinnitus are needed.

OBJECTIVE

Evaluate the effects of non-invasive neuromodulation on tinnitus through a metaanalysis and modeling study. The main hypothesis was that real as compared to sham neuromodulation that decreases tinnitus will modulate regions in line with the neurobiological models of tinnitus.

METHODS AND

RESULTS

The systematic review, conducted from Pubmed, Cochrane and PsycINFO databases, showed that active as compared to sham repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation (rTMS) reduced tinnitus, but active and sham transcranial direct current stimulation did not significantly differ. Further, rTMS over the auditory cortex was the most effective protocol. The modeling results indicate that this rTMS protocol elicited the strongest electric fields in the insula. Also, rTMS was particularly beneficial in women. Finally, the placebo effects were highly variable, highlighting the importance of conducting sham-controlled trials.

CONCLUSION

In sum, neuromodulation protocols that target the auditory cortex and the insula may hold clinical potential to treat tinnitus.

Для цитирования: Lefebvre-Demers Mathilde, Doyon Nicolas, Fecteau Shirley. Non-invasive neuromodulation for tinnitus: A meta-analysis and modeling studies.. Brain stimulation. 2020. DOI: 10.1016/j.brs.2020.11.014.

Предметные рубрики MeSH

Подготовка и перевод публикации
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…

История · было → стало

Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.

Тип публикации указан по данным источника. Уровень доказательности автоматически не присваивается.