Seroreactivity of antibodies to hepatitis B core antigen among hepatitis B surface antigen-screened negative blood donors and its implications for blood safety in a resource-constrained country.

BACKGROUND AND

OBJECTIVES

Transfusion-related hepatitis B infections have been reduced significantly with the implementation of blood screening using both serology and nucleic acid amplification technology (NAT) in developed countries. However, in resource-constrained countries, where NAT is inaccessible, the risk persists from early acute and occult cases. This study aimed to determine the antibodies to hepatitis B core antigen (anti-HBc) reactive rate among hepatitis B surface antigen (HBsAg)-screened negative blood donors and its impact on blood safety in the Philippines.

MATERIALS AND

METHODS

A total of 1602 HBsAg-negative samples, randomly collected from nine leading blood service facilities representative of each region in the Philippines, were tested for anti-HBc immunoglobulin M (IgM), Total and antibodies to HBsAg (anti-HBs) using the Architect i2000SR Immunoassay Analyser (Abbott Laboratories, IL). Anti-HBc IgM and/or Total repeat reactive were further tested for hepatitis B virus (HBV) NAT using the Cobas TaqScreen MPX v2.0 (Roche Diagnostics, Basel).

RESULTS

Overall, 19.16% HBsAg-negative samples (n = 307/1602) were reactive for either anti-HBc IgM or Total or a combination of both, of which 1.3% (n = 4/307) had detectable HBV-DNA and 80.5% (n = 247/307) were anti-HBs positive. About the anti-HBs titres, 30.27% (n = 485/1602) were positive (≥10 IU/L) with 55.67% (n = 270/485) having titres ≥100 IU/L. Anti-HBs-only-positive samples were 14.85% (n = 238/1602).

CONCLUSION

We observed a high anti-HBc reactive rate (19.16%) with 3.7% anti-HBc-only reactive (anti-HBs negative) and 1.3% HBV-DNA positive. This warrants the need to reconsider existing screening practices to improve blood safety in the country.