The journal of spinal cord medicine · 2003
Intravesical resiniferatoxin for refractory detrusor hyperreflexia: a multicenter, blinded, randomized, placebo-controlled trial.
Клиническое исследованиеСтатьяМногоцентровое исследованиеРандомизированное исследованиеПоддержка исследования: вне правительства СШАПоддержка службы здравоохранения СШАНазвание и аннотация: Перевод пока не подготовлен
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…
Ошибки и ограничения
История · было → стало
Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.
Kim Jang Hwan, Rivas David A, Shenot Patrick J, Green Bruce, Kennelly Michael, Erickson Janet R, O'Leary Margie, Yoshimura Naoki, Chancellor Michael B
Аннотация
OBJECTIVE: Resiniferatoxin (RTX) is an analogue of capsaicin with more than 1,000 times its potency in desensitizing C-fiber bladder afferent neurons. This study investigated the safety and efficacy of intravesical RTX in patients with refractory detrusor hyperreflexia (DH).
METHODS: Thirty-six (22 males, 14 females) neurologically impaired patients (20 spinal cord injury, 7 multiple sclerosis, 9 other neurologic diseases) with urodynamically verified DH and intractable urinary symptoms despite previous anticholinergic drug use were treated prospectively with intravesical RTX using dose escalation in a double-blind fashion at 4 centers. Patients received a single instillation of 100 mL of placebo (n = 8 patients) or 0.005, 0.025, 0.05, 0.10, 0.2, 0.5, or 1.0 microM of RTX (n = 4 each group). A visual analog pain scale (VAPS) (0-10; 10 = highest level of pain) was used to quantify discomfort of application. Treatment effect was monitored using a bladder diary and cystometric bladder capacity at weeks 1, 3, 6, and 12 posttreatment.
RESULTS: Mean VAPS scores revealed minimal to mild discomfort with values of 2.85 and 2.28 for the 0.5-microM and 1.0-microM RTX treatment groups, respectively. Due to the small sample size, there were no statistically significant changes in mean cystometric capacity (MCC) or incontinence episodes in each treatment dose group. However, at 3 weeks, MCC increased by 53% and 48% for the 0.5-microM and 1.0-microM RTX treatment groups, respectively. Patients in the 0.5-microM and 1.0-microM groups with MCC < 300 mL at baseline showed greater improvements in MCC at 120.5% and 48%, respectively. In some patients, MCC increased up to 500% over baseline, despite a low RTX dose. Incontinence episodes decreased by 51.9% and 52.7% for the 0.5-microM and 1.0-microM RTX treatment groups, respectively. There were no long-term complications.
CONCLUSION: Intravesical RTX administration, in general, is a well-tolerated new therapy for DH. This patient group was refractory to all previous oral pharmacologic therapy, yet some patients responded with significant improvement in bladder capacity and continence function shortly after RTX administration. Patients at risk for autonomic dysreflexia require careful monitoring during RTX therapy.
METHODS: Thirty-six (22 males, 14 females) neurologically impaired patients (20 spinal cord injury, 7 multiple sclerosis, 9 other neurologic diseases) with urodynamically verified DH and intractable urinary symptoms despite previous anticholinergic drug use were treated prospectively with intravesical RTX using dose escalation in a double-blind fashion at 4 centers. Patients received a single instillation of 100 mL of placebo (n = 8 patients) or 0.005, 0.025, 0.05, 0.10, 0.2, 0.5, or 1.0 microM of RTX (n = 4 each group). A visual analog pain scale (VAPS) (0-10; 10 = highest level of pain) was used to quantify discomfort of application. Treatment effect was monitored using a bladder diary and cystometric bladder capacity at weeks 1, 3, 6, and 12 posttreatment.
RESULTS: Mean VAPS scores revealed minimal to mild discomfort with values of 2.85 and 2.28 for the 0.5-microM and 1.0-microM RTX treatment groups, respectively. Due to the small sample size, there were no statistically significant changes in mean cystometric capacity (MCC) or incontinence episodes in each treatment dose group. However, at 3 weeks, MCC increased by 53% and 48% for the 0.5-microM and 1.0-microM RTX treatment groups, respectively. Patients in the 0.5-microM and 1.0-microM groups with MCC < 300 mL at baseline showed greater improvements in MCC at 120.5% and 48%, respectively. In some patients, MCC increased up to 500% over baseline, despite a low RTX dose. Incontinence episodes decreased by 51.9% and 52.7% for the 0.5-microM and 1.0-microM RTX treatment groups, respectively. There were no long-term complications.
CONCLUSION: Intravesical RTX administration, in general, is a well-tolerated new therapy for DH. This patient group was refractory to all previous oral pharmacologic therapy, yet some patients responded with significant improvement in bladder capacity and continence function shortly after RTX administration. Patients at risk for autonomic dysreflexia require careful monitoring during RTX therapy.
Предметные рубрики MeSH
Administration, IntravesicalAdultAgedDiterpenesDose-Response Relationship, DrugDouble-Blind MethodFemaleHumansMaleMiddle AgedMultiple SclerosisMuscle HypertoniaNerve Fibers, UnmyelinatedNervous System DiseasesNeurotoxinsPain MeasurementRisk FactorsSpinal Cord InjuriesTreatment OutcomeUrinary BladderUrinary Bladder, NeurogenicUrodynamics