Indications and Outcomes for Planned Cesarean Hysterectomy in Non-Placenta Accreta Spectrum Disorder Patients: A Systematic Review.

OBJECTIVE

Planned hysterectomy at the time of cesarean delivery may be reasonable in cases other than placenta accreta spectrum disorders. Our objective was to synthesize the published literature on the indications and outcomes for planned cesarean hysterectomy.

DATA SOURCES: We performed a systematic review of published literature from the following databases from inception (1946) to June 2021: MEDLINE, PubMed, EMBASE, Cochrane CENTRAL, DARE, and clinicaltrials.gov.

STUDY SELECTION: We included all study designs where subjects underwent planned cesarean delivery with simultaneous hysterectomy. Emergency procedures and those performed for placenta accreta spectrum disorders were excluded.

DATA EXTRACTION AND SYNTHESIS: The primary outcome was surgical indication, though other surgical outcomes were evaluated when data permitted. Quantitative analysis was limited to studies published in 1990 or later. Risk of bias was assessed using an adaptation of the ROBINS-I tool.

CONCLUSION

The most common indication for planned cesarean hysterectomy was malignancy, with cervical cancer being the most frequent. Other indications included permanent contraception, uterine fibroids, menstrual disorders, and chronic pelvic pain. Common complications included bleeding, infection, and ileus. The surgical skill for cesarean hysterectomy continues to be relevant in contemporary obstetrical practice for reproductive malignancy and several benign indications. Although the data indicate relatively safe outcomes, these studies show significant publication bias and, therefore, further systematic study of this procedure is justified.

PROSPERO REGISTRATION NUMBER: CRD42021260545, registered June 16, 2021.