MedElevator Войти в исследования
← Поиск публикаций

DOI 10.1111/j.1600-0536.2008.01350.x

Медицинская библиотека · Contact dermatitis · 2008

The outcome of dimethylglyoxime testing in a sample of cell phones in Denmark.

Thyssen Jacob Pontoppidan, Johansen Jeanne D, Zachariae Claus, Menné Torkil

Клинический случайСтатьяПоддержка исследования: вне правительства СШАПеревод пока не подготовлен

Аннотация

BACKGROUND

Nickel dermatitis may be caused by frequent and prolonged use of cell phones. Because little is known about the frequency of nickel release from cell phones, it is difficult to estimate the risk of nickel sensitization and dermatitis among their users.

OBJECTIVE

Inspired by a recent case of nickel dermatitis from prolonged cell phone use, the frequency of dimethylglyoxime (DMG)-positive cell phones on the Danish market was investigated.

METHODS

Five major cell phone companies were contacted. Two were visited, and the DMG test was performed on a sample of their products.

RESULTS

5 of 15 (33.3%) phones from company A and 3 of 26 (11.5%) phones from company B showed at least 1 positive reaction. 3 phones had more than 1 positive DMG spots.

CONCLUSIONS

This study documents that excessive nickel release (i.e. a positive DMG test) is relatively frequent in a sample of cell phones from the Danish market. Prolonged use of cell phones may in some cases fulfil the criteria for items included in the European Union Nickel Directive. We believe that this new cause of nickel dermatitis should be carefully followed and that regulatory steps may be necessary.

Для цитирования: Thyssen Jacob Pontoppidan, Johansen Jeanne D, Zachariae Claus, Menné Torkil. The outcome of dimethylglyoxime testing in a sample of cell phones in Denmark.. Contact dermatitis. 2008. DOI: 10.1111/j.1600-0536.2008.01350.x.

Предметные рубрики MeSH

Подготовка и перевод публикации
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…

История · было → стало

Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.

Тип публикации указан по данным источника. Уровень доказательности автоматически не присваивается.