MedElevator Войти в исследования
← Поиск публикаций

DOI 10.1016/j.jaad.2008.03.017

Медицинская библиотека · Journal of the American Academy of Dermatology · 2008

Nickel release from earrings purchased in the United States: the San Francisco earring study.

Thyssen Jacob Pontoppidan, Maibach Howard Ira

СтатьяПоддержка исследования: вне правительства СШАПеревод пока не подготовлен

Аннотация

BACKGROUND

Nickel sensitization is frequent among US patients with dermatitis and in the general population. In Europe, decreasing prevalences of nickel sensitization are observed as a result of the European Union Nickel Directive. However, no directive exists in the United States.

OBJECTIVES

We sought to examine nickel release from inexpensive earrings and discuss possible methods of reducing nickel exposure among consumers.

METHODS

A total of 34 different stores and artists were visited. A total of 277 earrings were purchased and examined with the dimethylglyoxime (DMG) test.

RESULTS

DMG-positive earrings were identified from local artists (69%) and tourist stores (42.9%) but also chain stores targeting young (24.1%) and mature (1.7%) women. No correlation between price and outcome of DMG testing was identified.

LIMITATIONS: Our study does not reflect buying trends in the United States. Pretreatment of earrings with artificial sweat was not performed and the DMG may lead to both false-positive and false-negative results.

CONCLUSIONS

Nickel exposure from inexpensive earrings is frequent in the United States. A regulatory governmental intervention may be warranted.

Для цитирования: Thyssen Jacob Pontoppidan, Maibach Howard Ira. Nickel release from earrings purchased in the United States: the San Francisco earring study.. Journal of the American Academy of Dermatology. 2008. DOI: 10.1016/j.jaad.2008.03.017.

Предметные рубрики MeSH

Подготовка и перевод публикации
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…

История · было → стало

Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.

Тип публикации указан по данным источника. Уровень доказательности автоматически не присваивается.