European journal of radiology · 2023
Machine learning based ischemia-specific stenosis prediction: A Chinese multicenter coronary CT angiography study.
Многоцентровое исследованиеСтатьяНазвание и аннотация: Перевод пока не подготовлен
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…
Ошибки и ограничения
История · было → стало
Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.
Zhang Xiao Lei, Zhang Bo, Tang Chun Xiang, Wang Yi Ning, Zhang Jia Yin, Yu Meng Meng, Hou Yang, Zheng Min Wen, Zhang Dai Min, Hu Xiu Hua, Xu Lei, Liu Hui, Sun Zhi Yuan, Zhang Long Jiang
Аннотация
OBJECTIVES: To evaluate the performance of coronary computed tomography angiography (CCTA) derived characteristics including CT derived fractional flow reserve (CT-FFR) with FFR as a reference standard in identifying the lesion-specific ischemia by machine learning (ML) algorithms.
METHODS: The retrospective analysis enrolled 596 vessels in 462 patients (mean age, 61 years ± 11 [SD]; 71.4 % men) with suspected coronary artery disease who underwent CCTA and invasive FFR. The data were divided into training cohort, internal validation cohort, external validation cohorts 1 and 2 according to participating centers. All CCTA-derived parameters, which contained 10 qualitative and 33 quantitative plaque parameters, were collected to establish ML model. The Boruta and unsupervised clustering algorithm were implemented to select important and non-redundant parameters. Finally, the eight features with the highest mean importance were included for further ML model establishment and decision tree building. Five models were built to predict lesion-specific ischemia: stenosis degree from CCTA, CT-FFR, ΔCT-FFR, ML model and nested model.
RESULTS: Low-attenuation plaque, bend and lesion length were the main predictors of ischemia-specific lesions. Of 5 models, the ML model showed favorable discrimination for ischemia-specific lesions in the training and three validation sets (area under the curve [95 % confidence interval], 0.93 [0.90-0.96], 0.86 [0.79-0.94], 0.88 [0.83-0.94], and 0.90 [0.84-0.96], respectively). The nested model which combined the ML model and CT-FFR showed better diagnostic efficacy (AUC [95 %CI], 0.96 [0.94-0.99], 0.92 [0.86-0.99], 0.92 [0.86-0.99] and 0.94 [0.91-0.98], respectively; all P < 0.05), and net reclassification improvement (NRI) and integrated discrimination improvement (IDI) were significantly higher than CT-FFR alone.
CONCLUSIONS: Comprehensive CCTA-derived multiparameter model could better predict the ischemia-specific lesions by ML algorithms compared to stenosis degree from CTA, CT-FFR and ΔCT-FFR. Decision tree can be used to predict myocardial ischemia effectively.
METHODS: The retrospective analysis enrolled 596 vessels in 462 patients (mean age, 61 years ± 11 [SD]; 71.4 % men) with suspected coronary artery disease who underwent CCTA and invasive FFR. The data were divided into training cohort, internal validation cohort, external validation cohorts 1 and 2 according to participating centers. All CCTA-derived parameters, which contained 10 qualitative and 33 quantitative plaque parameters, were collected to establish ML model. The Boruta and unsupervised clustering algorithm were implemented to select important and non-redundant parameters. Finally, the eight features with the highest mean importance were included for further ML model establishment and decision tree building. Five models were built to predict lesion-specific ischemia: stenosis degree from CCTA, CT-FFR, ΔCT-FFR, ML model and nested model.
RESULTS: Low-attenuation plaque, bend and lesion length were the main predictors of ischemia-specific lesions. Of 5 models, the ML model showed favorable discrimination for ischemia-specific lesions in the training and three validation sets (area under the curve [95 % confidence interval], 0.93 [0.90-0.96], 0.86 [0.79-0.94], 0.88 [0.83-0.94], and 0.90 [0.84-0.96], respectively). The nested model which combined the ML model and CT-FFR showed better diagnostic efficacy (AUC [95 %CI], 0.96 [0.94-0.99], 0.92 [0.86-0.99], 0.92 [0.86-0.99] and 0.94 [0.91-0.98], respectively; all P < 0.05), and net reclassification improvement (NRI) and integrated discrimination improvement (IDI) were significantly higher than CT-FFR alone.
CONCLUSIONS: Comprehensive CCTA-derived multiparameter model could better predict the ischemia-specific lesions by ML algorithms compared to stenosis degree from CTA, CT-FFR and ΔCT-FFR. Decision tree can be used to predict myocardial ischemia effectively.
Предметные рубрики MeSH
FemaleHumansMaleMiddle AgedComputed Tomography AngiographyConstriction, PathologicCoronary AngiographyCoronary Artery DiseaseCoronary StenosisEast Asian PeopleFractional Flow Reserve, MyocardialIschemiaMachine LearningPlaque, AtheroscleroticPredictive Value of TestsRetrospective StudiesTomography, X-Ray ComputedAged