MedElevator Войти в исследования
← Поиск публикаций

DOI 10.1155/2014/923171

Медицинская библиотека · BioMed research international · 2014

Venous ligation: a novel strategy for glans enhancement in penile prosthesis implantation.

Hsu Geng-Long, Hill James W, Hsieh Cheng-Hsing, Liu Shih-Ping, Hsu Chih-Yuan

СтатьяПеревод пока не подготовлен

Аннотация

Although penile implantation remains a final solution for patients with refractory impotence, undesirable postoperative effects, including penile size reduction and cold sensation of the glans penis, remain problematic. We report results of a surgical method designed to avoid these problems. From 2003 to 2013, 35 consecutive patients received a malleable penile implant. Of these, 15 men (the enhancing group) were also treated with venous ligation of the retrocoronal venous plexus, deep dorsal vein, and cavernosal veins. The remaining 20 men formed the control group, treated with only a penile implant. Follow-up ranged from 1.1 to 10.0 years, with an average of 6.7 ± 1.5 years. Although preoperative glanular dimension did not differ significantly between the two groups, significant respective difference at one day and one year postoperatively was found in the glanular circumference (128.8 ± 6.8 mm versus 115.3 ± 7.2 mm and 130.6 ± 7.2 mm versus 100.5 ± 7.3 mm; both P<0.05), radius (38.8 ± 2.7 mm versus 37.1 ± 2.8 mm and 41.5 ± 2.6 mm versus 33.8 ± 2.9 mm; latter P<0.01), and satisfaction rate (91.7% versus 53.3%, P<0.01) as well. Based on our results, selective venous ligation appears to enhance the glans penis dimension in implant patients.

Для цитирования: Hsu Geng-Long, Hill James W, Hsieh Cheng-Hsing, Liu Shih-Ping, Hsu Chih-Yuan. Venous ligation: a novel strategy for glans enhancement in penile prosthesis implantation.. BioMed research international. 2014. DOI: 10.1155/2014/923171.

Предметные рубрики MeSH

Подготовка и перевод публикации
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…

История · было → стало

Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.

Тип публикации указан по данным источника. Уровень доказательности автоматически не присваивается.