MedElevator Войти в исследования
← Поиск публикаций

DOI 10.1001/jamapsychiatry.2013.2350

Медицинская библиотека · JAMA psychiatry · 2013

Boundaries of schizoaffective disorder: revisiting Kraepelin.

Kotov Roman, Leong Shirley H, Mojtabai Ramin, Erlanger Ann C Eckardt, Fochtmann Laura J, Constantino Eduardo, Carlson Gabrielle A, Bromet Evelyn J

Сравнительное исследованиеСтатьяПоддержка NIH: внешняя программаПеревод пока не подготовлен

Аннотация

IMPORTANCE

Established nosology identifies schizoaffective disorder as a distinct category with boundaries separating it from mood disorders with psychosis and from schizophrenia. Alternative models argue for a single boundary distinguishing mood disorders with psychosis from schizophrenia (kraepelinian dichotomy) or a continuous spectrum from affective to nonaffective psychosis.

OBJECTIVE

To identify natural boundaries within psychotic disorders by evaluating associations between symptom course and long-term outcome.

DESIGN, SETTING, AND

PARTICIPANTS

The Suffolk County Mental Health Project cohort consists of first-admission patients with psychosis recruited from all inpatient units of Suffolk County, New York (72% response rate). In an inception cohort design, participants were monitored closely for 4 years after admission, and their symptom course was charted for 526 individuals; 10-year outcome was obtained for 413.

MAIN OUTCOMES AND MEASURES: Global Assessment of Functioning (GAF) and other consensus ratings of study psychiatrists.

RESULTS

We used nonlinear modeling (locally weighted scatterplot smoothing and spline regression) to examine links between 4-year symptom variables (ratio of nonaffective psychosis to mood disturbance, duration of mania/hypomania, depression, and psychosis) and 10-year outcomes. Nonaffective psychosis ratio exhibited a sharp discontinuity-10 days or more of psychosis outside mood episodes predicted an 11-point decrement in GAF-consistent with the kraepelinian dichotomy. Duration of mania/hypomania showed 2 discontinuities demarcating 3 groups: mania absent, episodic mania, and chronic mania (manic/hypomanic >1 year). The episodic group had a better outcome compared with the mania absent and chronic mania groups (12-point and 8-point difference on GAF). Duration of depression and psychosis had linear associations with worse outcome.

CONCLUSIONS AND RELEVANCE: Our data support the kraepelinian dichotomy, although the study requires replication. A boundary between schizoaffective disorder and schizophrenia was not observed, which casts further doubt on schizoaffective diagnosis. Co-occurring schizophrenia and mood disorder may be better coded as separate diagnoses, an approach that could simplify diagnosis, improve its reliability, and align it with the natural taxonomy.

Для цитирования: Kotov Roman, Leong Shirley H, Mojtabai Ramin, Erlanger Ann C Eckardt, Fochtmann Laura J, Constantino Eduardo, Carlson Gabrielle A, Bromet Evelyn J. Boundaries of schizoaffective disorder: revisiting Kraepelin.. JAMA psychiatry. 2013. DOI: 10.1001/jamapsychiatry.2013.2350.

Предметные рубрики MeSH

Подготовка и перевод публикации
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…

История · было → стало

Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.

Тип публикации указан по данным источника. Уровень доказательности автоматически не присваивается.