MedElevator Войти в исследования
← Поиск публикаций

DOI 10.3233/thc-220189

Медицинская библиотека · Technology and health care : official journal of the European Society for Engineering and Medicine · 2023

Tone evaluation of Ling sound test in Mandarin tone version.

Zuo Yufeng, Wang Yuxin, Liu Shu, Yan Hongxu, Liu Lin, Wang Xing

СтатьяПеревод пока не подготовлен

Аннотация

BACKGROUND

The Ling sound test cannot provide the test of Chinese tone for preschool children with hearing aid and cochlear implants.

OBJECTIVE

The paper tries to design a new tone test method composed of the Ling sound test and four Chinese tones to evaluate the hearing level of Chinese hearing-impaired children.

METHODS

The tone identification rates of 20 cochlear implant children were statistically analyzed to verify the validity of the Ling sound test in the Chinese tone version. In addition, this paper analyzed the pronunciation characteristics of the Ling sound test in the Chongqing-accented Mandarin version of 20 subjects.

RESULTS

The identification rate of Ling six sounds was more than 97.0%, the identification rate of tone was more than 81.0%, and the identification rate of vowels was 83.1%, which was higher than that of consonants 79.0%. The Ling sound test n the Chongqing-accented Mandarin version has a narrower frequency range.

CONCLUSION

The results verify the effectiveness and feasibility of the Ling sound test in the Chinese tone version in the assessment of frequency range and tone identification for cochlear implant users.

Для цитирования: Zuo Yufeng, Wang Yuxin, Liu Shu, Yan Hongxu, Liu Lin, Wang Xing. Tone evaluation of Ling sound test in Mandarin tone version.. Technology and health care : official journal of the European Society for Engineering and Medicine. 2023. DOI: 10.3233/thc-220189.

Предметные рубрики MeSH

Подготовка и перевод публикации
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…

История · было → стало

Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.

Тип публикации указан по данным источника. Уровень доказательности автоматически не присваивается.