MedElevator Войти в исследования
← Поиск публикаций

DOI 10.1155/2020/3141278

Медицинская библиотека · BioMed research international · 2020

Low-Frequency Repetitive Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation for the Treatment of Chronic Tinnitus: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of Randomized Controlled Trials.

Dong Changhong, Chen Cheng, Wang Teng, Gao Chunjiu, Wang Yidan, Guan Xinying, Dong Xin

СтатьяМетаанализСистематический обзорПеревод пока не подготовлен

Аннотация

BACKGROUND

Chronic tinnitus affects approximately 10-15% of the population. Low-frequency repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation (rTMS) has been considered as a promising and well-tolerated therapeutic strategy for chronic tinnitus. However, a recent large-scale multicenter clinical trial showed a negative result.

OBJECTIVE

This systematic review is aimed at assessing the efficacy and safety of low-frequency rTMS in chronic tinnitus.

METHODS

We searched PubMed, Embase, and Cochrane Library for randomized controlled studies of rTMS treatment of chronic tinnitus. A pooled analysis of standardized mean difference (SMD) was performed with 95% confidence intervals (CI).

RESULTS

Ten RCTs involving 567 participants were included in this review. Compared with sham stimulation, rTMS showed no significant efficacy in tinnitus severity and disability measured by Tinnitus Handicap Inventory (THI) in short-term (SMD = -0.04, 95% CI -0.23 to 0.16, P = 0.72), medium-term (SMD = -0.13, 95% CI -0.43 to 0.17, P = 0.41), and long-term (SMD = -0.16, 95% CI -0.38 to 0.05, P = 0.14) follow-up. Tinnitus severity and disability measured by Tinnitus Questionnaire (TQ) also showed no significant improvement in short-term (SMD = -0.11, 95% CI -0.31 to 0.10, P = 0.30), medium-term (SMD = -0.10, 95% CI -0.37 to 0.16, P = 0.44), and long-term (SMD = -0.20, 95% CI -0.40 to 0.01, P = 0.06) follow-up. Additionally, no statistically significant difference was shown in the changes of tinnitus loudness assessed by a visual analogue scale (VAS) between rTMS and sham groups in the short-term (SMD = -0.28, 95% CI -0.59 to 0.02, P = 0.07), medium-term (SMD = -0.26, 95% CI -0.59 to 0.07, P = 0.13), and long-term (SMD = -0.20, 95% CI -0.53 to 0.13, P = 0.24) follow-up. Few mild or moderate adverse events were observed in both the rTMS and sham groups.

CONCLUSION

Low-frequency rTMS is well tolerated but not effective in treating chronic tinnitus based on the current analysis of pooled data. Further studies with modified and uniform protocols are required to investigate the potential benefit of rTMS in chronic tinnitus.

Для цитирования: Dong Changhong, Chen Cheng, Wang Teng, Gao Chunjiu, Wang Yidan, Guan Xinying, Dong Xin. Low-Frequency Repetitive Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation for the Treatment of Chronic Tinnitus: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of Randomized Controlled Trials.. BioMed research international. 2020. DOI: 10.1155/2020/3141278.

Предметные рубрики MeSH

Подготовка и перевод публикации
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…

История · было → стало

Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.

Тип публикации указан по данным источника. Уровень доказательности автоматически не присваивается.