DOI 10.1097/mao.0b013e3182001c7d
Late failure rate of hearing preservation after middle fossa approach for resection of vestibular schwannoma.
Аннотация
OBJECTIVE
To explore the long-term hearing results after a middle fossa approach for resection of vestibular schwannoma.
STUDY
DESIGN
Retrospective case review.
SETTING
Tertiary referral center.
PATIENTS: All patients undergoing a middle fossa approach for resection of vestibular schwannoma at a single institution with intent to preserve hearing between December 1989 and December 2009 were included in the study population.
INTERVENTIONS: Standard middle fossa approach for resection of vestibular schwannoma, magnetic resonance imaging (MRI), and audiogram.
MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Recurrence of tumor as evaluated by MRI and hearing results as measured by serial audiograms.
RESULTS
Seventy-eight patients were identified who met study criteria. Fifty-one (65%) of the 78 patients had usable hearing (American Academy of Otolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery [AAO-HNS] class A or B) postoperatively. Forty-four patients with successful hearing preservation had follow-up beyond their initial postoperative visit. Five (11%) of the 44 patients showed late degradation to nonserviceable hearing (AAO-HNS class C or D) over a mean follow-up of 4.0 years. Kaplan-Meier estimate of preservation of class A or B hearing at 10 years was 72%. Of the five patients with late degradation in hearing, 2 were found to have recurrences of their original tumor on MRI. There were 5 confirmed recurrences in the total study population.
CONCLUSION
Late degradation of hearing was an infrequent occurrence after initially successful hearing preservation. When hearing degradation did occur, there seemed to be a correlation with tumor recurrence.
Предметные рубрики MeSH
Подготовка и перевод публикации
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Ошибки и ограничения
История · было → стало
Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.
Тип публикации указан по данным источника. Уровень доказательности автоматически не присваивается.