MedElevator Войти в исследования
← Поиск публикаций

DOI 10.1046/j.1468-1331.1998.520137.x

Медицинская библиотека · European journal of neurology · 1998

The management and outcome of patients with myasthenia gravis treated acutely in a neurological intensive care unit.

O'Riordan JI, Miller DH, Mottershead JP, Hirsch NP, Howard RS

СтатьяПеревод пока не подготовлен

Аннотация

The management and clinical course of patients with myasthenia gravis admitted to a neurological intensive therapy unit (ITU) over a 66 month period were reviewed. Twenty-seven patients were admitted in myasthenic crisis, eight of whom had multiple admissions. One patient had a cholinergic crisis and a further patient an acute myocardial infarction. A specific aetiological factor precipitating myasthenic crisis was identified in 19 instances: infection (8), reduction in medication (5), menstruation (4), and steroid administration (2). Thirteen patients with crisis had had a previous thymectomy, six with thymoma. Twenty-three out of 35 (66%) patients admitted in crisis required intubation; nine subsequently needed a tracheostomy. Twenty-nine patients received plasma exchange and seven intravenous immunoglobulin. Four patients in myasthenic crisis died in ITU [adult respiratory distress syndrome (1), disseminated intravascular coagulation and cytomegalovirus (CMV) pneumonitis (1), cardiac failure (1) and multiple organ failure (1)]. Appropriate management of myasthenia gravis requires the easy availability of specialised neuro-intensive care facilities. Copyright Rapid Science Ltd

Для цитирования: O'Riordan JI, Miller DH, Mottershead JP, Hirsch NP, Howard RS. The management and outcome of patients with myasthenia gravis treated acutely in a neurological intensive care unit.. European journal of neurology. 1998. DOI: 10.1046/j.1468-1331.1998.520137.x.
Подготовка и перевод публикации
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…

История · было → стало

Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.

Тип публикации указан по данным источника. Уровень доказательности автоматически не присваивается.