MedElevator Войти в исследования
← Поиск публикаций

DOI 10.1164/ajrccm.157.3.9703014

Медицинская библиотека · American journal of respiratory and critical care medicine · 1998

Recurrent Pseudomonas aeruginosa pneumonia in ventilated patients: relapse or reinfection?

Rello J, Mariscal D, March F, Jubert P, Sanchez F, Valles J, Coll P

Сравнительное исследованиеСтатьяПоддержка исследования: вне правительства СШАПеревод пока не подготовлен

Аннотация

A prospective observational study was performed to determine whether recurrent episodes of pneumonia caused by Pseudomonas aeruginosa in ventilated patients were due to a relapse of the previous clone or to reinfection with a new one. Diagnosis was based on quantitative cultures of secretions obtained by bronchoscopy. Comparison of strains was made by chromosomal fingerprinting based on pulsed field gel electrophoresis (PFGE). Thirty-three (89.1%) of 37 patients survived the initial week after pneumonia diagnosis; six survivors (18.1%) had multiple episodes caused by the same species. Presence of adult respiratory distress syndrome (83.3% versus 22.2%, p = 0.02) was the only factor significantly associated with clinical recurrences. The 16 isolates from five patients (nine recurrences) were analyzed by PFGE. All new isolates from recurrent episodes, excepting one, were considered as relapses. These data suggest that most recurrent episodes of P. aeruginosa pneumonia in ventilated patients occur due to persistence of strains present in a prior infection.

Для цитирования: Rello J, Mariscal D, March F, Jubert P, Sanchez F, Valles J, Coll P. Recurrent Pseudomonas aeruginosa pneumonia in ventilated patients: relapse or reinfection?. American journal of respiratory and critical care medicine. 1998. DOI: 10.1164/ajrccm.157.3.9703014.

Предметные рубрики MeSH

Подготовка и перевод публикации
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…

История · было → стало

Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.

Тип публикации указан по данным источника. Уровень доказательности автоматически не присваивается.