Journal of refractive surgery (Thorofare, N.J. : 1995) · 2025
Comparison of Customized and Standard Corneal Cross-linking for Ectasia After Laser in Situ Keratomileusis.
СтатьяСравнительное исследованиеНазвание и аннотация: Перевод пока не подготовлен
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…
Ошибки и ограничения
История · было → стало
Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.
Utti Elina M, Krootila Md Kari M
Аннотация
PURPOSE: To evaluate the effect of customized corneal cross-linking (CXL) in ectasia after laser in situ keratomileusis (LASIK).
METHODS: Thirty-two eyes of 24 patients with post-LASIK ectasia treated with customized CXL were included in this study. Treatment zones with different ultraviolet energy levels were planned according to corneal tomography. A control group of 19 eyes of 14 patients with post-LASIK ectasia received conventional CXL. Patients were prospectively followed up at 1 month, 6 months, and 1 year after the procedure. Subsequent follow-up 2 to 4 years after CXL was obtained from 22 eyes of 18 patients. Corrected distance visual acuity, refraction, and anterior segment optical coherence tomography parameters were compared to preoperative values.
RESULTS: After a transient deterioration at 1 month, visual acuity and keratometry stabilized at 6 months in both groups. One year after customized CXL, the visual acuity was significantly better (P< .01), corneal inferior-superior asymmetry decreased (P = .02), and corneal thickness increased (P < .01). These effects were maintained during the 2- to 4-year follow-up. There were no statistically significant changes in refractive outcomes or keratometry at 1 or 2 to 4 years. Decrease in higher order irregularities was seen only after customized CXL, but it did not reach statistical significance. In 1 patient the ectasia continued progressing after customized CXL, giving a failure rate of 4.2%.
CONCLUSIONS: Customized CXL seems to be as safe as standard CXL in treating progressive post-LASIK ectasia. The results suggest that customized CXL could have a better effect on visual acuity and corneal asymmetry. More studies are needed to verify the advantages of customized method over standard CXL.the [J Refract Surg. 2025;41(5):e451-e459.].
METHODS: Thirty-two eyes of 24 patients with post-LASIK ectasia treated with customized CXL were included in this study. Treatment zones with different ultraviolet energy levels were planned according to corneal tomography. A control group of 19 eyes of 14 patients with post-LASIK ectasia received conventional CXL. Patients were prospectively followed up at 1 month, 6 months, and 1 year after the procedure. Subsequent follow-up 2 to 4 years after CXL was obtained from 22 eyes of 18 patients. Corrected distance visual acuity, refraction, and anterior segment optical coherence tomography parameters were compared to preoperative values.
RESULTS: After a transient deterioration at 1 month, visual acuity and keratometry stabilized at 6 months in both groups. One year after customized CXL, the visual acuity was significantly better (P< .01), corneal inferior-superior asymmetry decreased (P = .02), and corneal thickness increased (P < .01). These effects were maintained during the 2- to 4-year follow-up. There were no statistically significant changes in refractive outcomes or keratometry at 1 or 2 to 4 years. Decrease in higher order irregularities was seen only after customized CXL, but it did not reach statistical significance. In 1 patient the ectasia continued progressing after customized CXL, giving a failure rate of 4.2%.
CONCLUSIONS: Customized CXL seems to be as safe as standard CXL in treating progressive post-LASIK ectasia. The results suggest that customized CXL could have a better effect on visual acuity and corneal asymmetry. More studies are needed to verify the advantages of customized method over standard CXL.the [J Refract Surg. 2025;41(5):e451-e459.].
Предметные рубрики MeSH
HumansKeratomileusis, Laser In SituCross-Linking ReagentsPhotosensitizing AgentsVisual AcuityDilatation, PathologicMaleRiboflavinAdultFemaleCollagenProspective StudiesUltraviolet RaysTomography, Optical CoherenceCorneal StromaPhotochemotherapyLasers, ExcimerRefraction, OcularCorneal TopographyYoung AdultFollow-Up StudiesPostoperative ComplicationsMiddle AgedCorneal PachymetryCorneal DiseasesKeratoconusCorneal Cross-Linking