Journal of neurosurgery · 2023
Troubleshooting the bypass: intraoperative management of initially failed anastomosis in direct cerebral revascularization surgery.
СтатьяНазвание и аннотация: Перевод пока не подготовлен
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…
Ошибки и ограничения
История · было → стало
Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.
Doron Omer, O'Donnell Devon B, Dallimore Colin, Khilji Hamza, Greisman Jacob D, Villagran Michelle, Ortiz Rafael A, Nossek Erez, Ellis Jason A, Langer David J
Аннотация
OBJECTIVE: Direct cerebral revascularization is considered as one of the most technically challenging operations in neurosurgery. Technical errors are often not identified during the case, but only after the recirculation stage, making management crucial at that time of the procedure. In this study, the authors sought to describe troubleshooting of the technical errors encountered in initially failed bypass cases.
METHODS: A retrospective analysis describing a single-surgeon, single-institution experience between 2014 and 2021 was performed, based on operative reports and videos, including a 30-day follow-up period. Initially failed bypass was defined if the bypass was not patent or had a significant leak after recirculation, irrespective of the final result.
RESULTS: One hundred thirty-eight bypass cases were reviewed for complex aneurysms (n = 49), moyamoya disease (n = 59), and atherosclerosis (n = 30). Fifty-one initially failed anastomoses were identified; 43 of these were the result of a technical error. Etiologies of these failed anastomoses included a clot (n = 14), vessel kinking (n = 4), spasm (n = 5), suture-related cause (n = 5), inappropriate donor or recipient (n = 3), or lack of demand (n = 8). A major leak was attributed to an uncoagulated side branch (n = 4), vessel injury due to suture/clip placement (n = 1), or inadequate suture line coverage (n = 7). Thirty-seven (86%) of 43 cases were troubleshot successfully, as salvage maneuvers included papaverine vessel massage, donor repositioning, re-anastomosis for occlusion in select cases, local hemostatic agents, and suturing or coagulating side branches in a leak. Thirty-day follow-up revealed similar rates of patency between successfully troubleshot patients (35/37) and the rest of the cases (80/87, p = 0.6).
CONCLUSIONS: Three major patterns of a noncompatible bypass were found: a major leak, an acute occlusion, or a delayed occlusion. Based on the authors' experience, salvage strategies proved successful, showing an eventual high patency rate. The authors suggest a gradual, structured algorithm to address this stage in surgery that may contribute specifically to cerebrovascular neurosurgeons at the beginning of their careers.
METHODS: A retrospective analysis describing a single-surgeon, single-institution experience between 2014 and 2021 was performed, based on operative reports and videos, including a 30-day follow-up period. Initially failed bypass was defined if the bypass was not patent or had a significant leak after recirculation, irrespective of the final result.
RESULTS: One hundred thirty-eight bypass cases were reviewed for complex aneurysms (n = 49), moyamoya disease (n = 59), and atherosclerosis (n = 30). Fifty-one initially failed anastomoses were identified; 43 of these were the result of a technical error. Etiologies of these failed anastomoses included a clot (n = 14), vessel kinking (n = 4), spasm (n = 5), suture-related cause (n = 5), inappropriate donor or recipient (n = 3), or lack of demand (n = 8). A major leak was attributed to an uncoagulated side branch (n = 4), vessel injury due to suture/clip placement (n = 1), or inadequate suture line coverage (n = 7). Thirty-seven (86%) of 43 cases were troubleshot successfully, as salvage maneuvers included papaverine vessel massage, donor repositioning, re-anastomosis for occlusion in select cases, local hemostatic agents, and suturing or coagulating side branches in a leak. Thirty-day follow-up revealed similar rates of patency between successfully troubleshot patients (35/37) and the rest of the cases (80/87, p = 0.6).
CONCLUSIONS: Three major patterns of a noncompatible bypass were found: a major leak, an acute occlusion, or a delayed occlusion. Based on the authors' experience, salvage strategies proved successful, showing an eventual high patency rate. The authors suggest a gradual, structured algorithm to address this stage in surgery that may contribute specifically to cerebrovascular neurosurgeons at the beginning of their careers.