MedElevator
Войти в исследования Journal of biomedical optics · 2023
Accuracy and precision of depth-resolved estimation of attenuation coefficients in optical coherence tomography.
СтатьяПоддержка исследования: вне правительства СШАНазвание и аннотация: Перевод пока не подготовлен
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…
Ошибки и ограничения
История · было → стало
Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.
Neubrand Linda B, van Leeuwen Ton G, Faber Dirk J
Аннотация
SIGNIFICANCE: Parametric imaging of the attenuation coefficient μOCT using optical coherence tomography (OCT) is a promising approach for evaluating abnormalities in tissue. To date, a standardized measure of accuracy and precision of μOCT by the depth-resolved estimation (DRE) method, as an alternative to least squares fitting, is missing.
AIM: We present a robust theoretical framework to determine accuracy and precision of the DRE of μOCT.
APPROACH: We derive and validate analytical expressions for the accuracy and precision of μOCT determination by the DRE using simulated OCT signals in absence and presence of noise. We compare the theoretically achievable precisions of the DRE method and the least-squares fitting approach.
RESULTS: Our analytical expressions agree with the numerical simulations for high signal-to-noise ratios and qualitatively describe the dependence on noise otherwise. A commonly used simplification of the DRE method results in a systematic overestimation of the attenuation coefficient in the order of μOCT2×Δ, where Δ is the pixel stepsize. When μOCT·|AFR|≲1.8, μOCT is reconstructed with higher precision by the depth-resolved method compared to fitting over the length of an axial fitting range |AFR|.
CONCLUSIONS: We derived and validated expressions for the accuracy and precision of DRE of μOCT. A commonly used simplification of this method is not recommended as being used for OCT-attenuation reconstruction. We give a rule of thumb providing guidance in the choice of estimation method.
AIM: We present a robust theoretical framework to determine accuracy and precision of the DRE of μOCT.
APPROACH: We derive and validate analytical expressions for the accuracy and precision of μOCT determination by the DRE using simulated OCT signals in absence and presence of noise. We compare the theoretically achievable precisions of the DRE method and the least-squares fitting approach.
RESULTS: Our analytical expressions agree with the numerical simulations for high signal-to-noise ratios and qualitatively describe the dependence on noise otherwise. A commonly used simplification of the DRE method results in a systematic overestimation of the attenuation coefficient in the order of μOCT2×Δ, where Δ is the pixel stepsize. When μOCT·|AFR|≲1.8, μOCT is reconstructed with higher precision by the depth-resolved method compared to fitting over the length of an axial fitting range |AFR|.
CONCLUSIONS: We derived and validated expressions for the accuracy and precision of DRE of μOCT. A commonly used simplification of this method is not recommended as being used for OCT-attenuation reconstruction. We give a rule of thumb providing guidance in the choice of estimation method.