MedElevator Войти в исследования
← Поиск публикаций
Медицинская библиотека · Journal of refractive surgery (Thorofare, N.J. : 1995) · 1995

Keratoconus detected by videokeratography in candidates for photorefractive keratectomy.

Nesburn A B, Bahri S, Salz J, Rabinowitz Y S, Maguen E, Hofbauer J, Berlin M, Macy J I

Клинический случайСтатьяПоддержка исследования: вне правительства СШАПеревод пока не подготовлен

Аннотация

BACKGROUND

Patients with corneal shape abnormalities should be identified prior to photorefractive keratectomy (PRK). We used videokeratography screening to detect subclinical corneal abnormalities, including keratoconus, which might have been missed by conventional clinical evaluation.

METHODS

One hundred forty-six apparently normal myopic eyes (-1.00 to -7.00 diopters [D] with less than 1.50 D of cylinder) of 91 consecutive patients who were candidates for PRK were screened by videokeratography.

RESULTS

In 6 of 91 patients (7 of 146 eyes), unsuspected corneal shape abnormalities were detected by videokeratography. Two patients had definite keratoconus and three were classified as keratoconus suspects by inferior corneal steepening (Rabinowitz I-S index ranging from 1.62 to 6.20 D). One patient had early pellucid marginal degeneration.

CONCLUSIONS

Keratoconus suspects and contact lens-induced changes resembling keratoconus are present in the "normal" myopic population that presents for refractive surgery. Videokeratographic screening is the only effective means of identifying these and other corneal shape abnormalities.

Для цитирования: Nesburn A B, Bahri S, Salz J, Rabinowitz Y S, Maguen E, Hofbauer J, Berlin M, Macy J I. Keratoconus detected by videokeratography in candidates for photorefractive keratectomy.. Journal of refractive surgery (Thorofare, N.J. : 1995). 1995.

Предметные рубрики MeSH

Подготовка и перевод публикации
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…

История · было → стало

Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.

Тип публикации указан по данным источника. Уровень доказательности автоматически не присваивается.