BMJ open · 2024
Epidemiology, management and patient needs in myasthenia gravis: an Italian multistakeholder consensus based on Delphi methodology.
СтатьяConsensus StatementНазвание и аннотация: Перевод пока не подготовлен
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…
Ошибки и ограничения
История · было → стало
Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.
Habetswallner Francesco, Iorio Raffaele, Annicchiarico Giuseppina, Limongelli Giuseppe, Uccheddu Maria Bonaria, Galeone Carlotta, Mariani Paolo, Mantegazza Renato
Аннотация
OBJECTIVES: To provide comprehensive information on the burden of myasthenia gravis (MG) in Italy, including the unmet needs of patients and several other aspects related to the disease, based on skilled viewpoints of MG experts.
DESIGN: Iterative analysis conducted in accordance with the best practices of the Delphi method, including anonymity, controlled feedback, and statistical stability of consensus.
SETTING AND PARTICIPANTS: 24 clinicians, 18 public health experts and 4 patient associations experts completed all the Delphi iterations between 18 April and 3 July 2023, for a total of 46 participants from several Italian Regions.
OUTCOME MEASURES: Five areas of investigation related to MG were examined: epidemiology in Italy and characteristics of disease; diagnostic issues and Italian patient journey; unmet needs during the acute and chronic phases of MG; quality of life; public health management of MG. Consensus in the Delphi iterations was defined by both the percentage level of agreement between panellists or the median value of the responses.
RESULTS: We reported a high level of agreement (ie, >66.7% of panellists) on the prevalence and incidence of disease in Italy and on several management issues. A strong impact of MG on the quality of life of patients also emerged. Cross-agreement was achieved among different subgroups of panellists (ie, clinicians, public health experts and patient associations representatives) for most items proposed.
CONCLUSIONS: This study provided guidance for educational and practical aspects of MG in Italy, highlighted disease severity and its role on patients' quality of life. A few gaps related to the handling of MG in Italy also emerged.
DESIGN: Iterative analysis conducted in accordance with the best practices of the Delphi method, including anonymity, controlled feedback, and statistical stability of consensus.
SETTING AND PARTICIPANTS: 24 clinicians, 18 public health experts and 4 patient associations experts completed all the Delphi iterations between 18 April and 3 July 2023, for a total of 46 participants from several Italian Regions.
OUTCOME MEASURES: Five areas of investigation related to MG were examined: epidemiology in Italy and characteristics of disease; diagnostic issues and Italian patient journey; unmet needs during the acute and chronic phases of MG; quality of life; public health management of MG. Consensus in the Delphi iterations was defined by both the percentage level of agreement between panellists or the median value of the responses.
RESULTS: We reported a high level of agreement (ie, >66.7% of panellists) on the prevalence and incidence of disease in Italy and on several management issues. A strong impact of MG on the quality of life of patients also emerged. Cross-agreement was achieved among different subgroups of panellists (ie, clinicians, public health experts and patient associations representatives) for most items proposed.
CONCLUSIONS: This study provided guidance for educational and practical aspects of MG in Italy, highlighted disease severity and its role on patients' quality of life. A few gaps related to the handling of MG in Italy also emerged.