The journal of applied laboratory medicine · 2024
IFN-α2 Autoantibody Screening and Functional Evaluation in Viral and Bacterial Infections.
СтатьяПоддержка исследования: вне правительства СШАНазвание и аннотация: Перевод пока не подготовлен
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…
Ошибки и ограничения
История · было → стало
Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.
Cockx Maaike, Steels Sophie, Michiels Birthe, Van Elslande Jan, Vermeersch Pieter, Frans Glynis, Claeys Kristl G, Desmet Stefanie, De Munter Paul, Bossuyt Xavier
Аннотация
BACKGROUND: The presence of anti-interferon (IFN)-α2 autoantibodies is a strong indicator of severe disease course during viral infections and is observed in autoimmune diseases (e.g., myasthenia gravis). Detection of these autoantibodies during severe bacterial infections is understudied. Multiple anti-IFN-α2 autoantibody screening assays are available. However, the results do not always correlate with the neutralizing capacity of the autoantibodies.
METHODS: Anti-IFN-α2 antibodies were measured by a Luminex-based assay in serum samples from individuals admitted to the intensive care unit infected with influenza (n = 38), invasive bacteria (n = 152), and severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) (n = 52). Anti-IFN-α2 antibodies were also studied in individuals with myasthenia gravis (n = 22) and in healthy individuals (n = 37). Individuals testing positive by Luminex were subsequently tested by enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay (ELISA) and tested for nonspecific reactivity and neutralization.
RESULTS: Three of 16 Luminex-positive samples had nonspecific reactivity, 11/16 were positive by ELISA, and 10/16 had neutralizing activity. Anti-IFN-α2 antibodies were found in individuals infected with SARS-CoV-2 (7/52), influenza (3/38), invasive bacteria [2/152, of which 1 was Legionella pneumophilia and was 1 Escherichia coli (E. coli) (out of 39 E. coli infections)], and in individuals with myasthenia gravis (2/22).
CONCLUSIONS: Anti-IFN-α2 autoantibodies were detected in viral infections, myasthenia gravis, and rarely in bacterial infections. ELISA and Luminex screening assays do not give similar results. Nonspecific reactivity and functional assays are necessary to validate the screening test result.
METHODS: Anti-IFN-α2 antibodies were measured by a Luminex-based assay in serum samples from individuals admitted to the intensive care unit infected with influenza (n = 38), invasive bacteria (n = 152), and severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) (n = 52). Anti-IFN-α2 antibodies were also studied in individuals with myasthenia gravis (n = 22) and in healthy individuals (n = 37). Individuals testing positive by Luminex were subsequently tested by enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay (ELISA) and tested for nonspecific reactivity and neutralization.
RESULTS: Three of 16 Luminex-positive samples had nonspecific reactivity, 11/16 were positive by ELISA, and 10/16 had neutralizing activity. Anti-IFN-α2 antibodies were found in individuals infected with SARS-CoV-2 (7/52), influenza (3/38), invasive bacteria [2/152, of which 1 was Legionella pneumophilia and was 1 Escherichia coli (E. coli) (out of 39 E. coli infections)], and in individuals with myasthenia gravis (2/22).
CONCLUSIONS: Anti-IFN-α2 autoantibodies were detected in viral infections, myasthenia gravis, and rarely in bacterial infections. ELISA and Luminex screening assays do not give similar results. Nonspecific reactivity and functional assays are necessary to validate the screening test result.