MedElevator Войти в исследования
← Поиск публикаций

DOI 10.1097/01.iae.0000254893.94013.16

Медицинская библиотека · Retina (Philadelphia, Pa.) · 2006

Serous macular detachment in branch retinal vein occlusion.

Yamaguchi Yumiko, Otani Tomohiro, Kishi Shoji

СтатьяПоддержка исследования: вне правительства СШАПеревод пока не подготовлен

Аннотация

PURPOSE: To evaluate the relationship between the extent of branch retinal vein occlusion (BRVO) and the incidence of serous retinal detachment (SRD) in the macular area.

METHODS

One hundred nine eyes of 109 consecutive patients with BRVO comprised the study population. These eyes were characterized as having either macular BRVO or major BRVO. We compared the tomographic macular findings between the two groups.

RESULTS

Thirty-nine eyes had macular BRVO, and 70 eyes had major BRVO. The incidence of SRD was higher in the group with major BRVO (63%) than in the group with macular BRVO (21%) (P < 0.001). The incidence of cystoid macular edema was similar in both groups (macular BRVO, 97%; and major BRVO, 90%). Foveal thickness of major BRVO (610 +/- 190 micro m) was significantly greater than that of macular BRVO (500 +/- 140 micro m) (P < 0.01). There was no significant difference in thickness of the neurosensory retina between the group with macular BRVO (450 +/- 120 micro m) and the group with major BRVO (480 +/- 140 micro m).

CONCLUSIONS

Serous macular detachment occurs more frequently in major BRVO than in macular BRVO. Vascular leakage from congested retinal veins outside the macular area appears to be a major source of subretinal fluid at the fovea.

Для цитирования: Yamaguchi Yumiko, Otani Tomohiro, Kishi Shoji. Serous macular detachment in branch retinal vein occlusion.. Retina (Philadelphia, Pa.). 2006. DOI: 10.1097/01.iae.0000254893.94013.16.

Предметные рубрики MeSH

Подготовка и перевод публикации
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…

История · было → стало

Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.

Тип публикации указан по данным источника. Уровень доказательности автоматически не присваивается.