MedElevator Войти в исследования
← Поиск публикаций

DOI 10.1186/s13017-025-00661-z

Медицинская библиотека · World journal of emergency surgery : WJES · 2025

How are duodenal trauma managed? A French nationwide study.

Frey Sébastien, Bentellis Imad, Gaujoux Sébastien, Girard Edouard, Abba Julio, Chirica Mircea, Bertrand Martin, Boutry Etienne, Mège Diane, Aubert Mathilde, Alves Arnaud, Hornez Emmanuel, Mulliri Andrea, Brustia Raffaele, Hentati Hassen, Lauka Lelde, Laurent Alexis, Sommacale Daniele, Turco Célia, Dezeustre Maude, Bajul Melinda, Castel Antoine, Facy Olivier, Grellet Robin, Sulpice Laurent, Ménégaux Fabrice, Delestre Maxime, Lermite Emilie, Monchal Tristan, Amrou Rida, Bacoeur-Ouzillou Ophélie, Pezet Denis, Bonnet Jeremy, Buc Emmanuel, Passot Guillaume, Schneck Anne-Sophie, Birnbaum David Jérémie, Blanc Pierre-Yves, Le Roy Bertrand, Monneuse Olivier, Rodriguez Quentin, Suc Bertrand, Baqué Patrick, Dubuisson Vincent, Massalou Damien

СтатьяНаблюдательное исследованиеПеревод в очереди

Аннотация

BACKGROUND

Duodenal injuries are rare, associated with a significant morbidity. Their management is challanging and remains controversial.

METHODS

A retrospective study of all consecutive patients with duodenal trauma managed in 21 French trauma centers from 2004 to 2023. Clinical data, trauma mechanisms, injury severity, treatment modalities and outcomes were collected. Specific attention was given to surgical techniques such as damage control laparotomy, primary repair only and duodenal diversion. Statistical analysis was performed to identify factors associated with duodenal leak, severe morbidity and mortality.

RESULTS

One hundred and thirty-five patients (71.7% male, mean age 35 years) were included, 64% with blunt trauma. Duodenal AAST grades I-II occurred in 68.2% and grades III-V in 31.8%. A discrepancy between radiologic evaluation and intraoperative observations was present in 30.8% of cases, underestimating injury severity in 29.1%. Initial management was nonoperative for 12.7%. Damage control laparotomy was required in 36.6%. Operated patients underwent direct suture (69.2%), duodenal resection (24.4%), duodenal diversion (35.8%). Duodenal leaks occurred in 23.7%, significantly increased by hemodynamic instability (OR = 3.08, p = 0.015) and associated pancreatic trauma (OR = 2.44, p = 0.044). Reoperation rate was 18.5%, for missed duodenal injury (16%) and/or for duodenal leak (32%). Mean length of stay was 27 days. Major morbidity was 27.4% and 30-day mortality 10.4%. The injury severity score was the only predictive factor of major morbidity and mortality.

CONCLUSIONS

Duodenal trauma remains a severe condition managed mostly with primary repair, where duodenal leak-significantly associated with hemodynamic instability and pancreatic injury, is a major driver of reintervention.

TRIAL REGISTRATION: This study was registered on Clinical Trials under the registration numbe NCT06058975.

Для цитирования: Frey Sébastien, Bentellis Imad, Gaujoux Sébastien, Girard Edouard, Abba Julio, Chirica Mircea, Bertrand Martin, Boutry Etienne, Mège Diane, Aubert Mathilde, Alves Arnaud, Hornez Emmanuel, Mulliri Andrea, Brustia Raffaele, Hentati Hassen, Lauka Lelde, Laurent Alexis, Sommacale Daniele, Turco Célia, Dezeustre Maude, Bajul Melinda, Castel Antoine, Facy Olivier, Grellet Robin, Sulpice Laurent, Ménégaux Fabrice, Delestre Maxime, Lermite Emilie, Monchal Tristan, Amrou Rida, Bacoeur-Ouzillou Ophélie, Pezet Denis, Bonnet Jeremy, Buc Emmanuel, Passot Guillaume, Schneck Anne-Sophie, Birnbaum David Jérémie, Blanc Pierre-Yves, Le Roy Bertrand, Monneuse Olivier, Rodriguez Quentin, Suc Bertrand, Baqué Patrick, Dubuisson Vincent, Massalou Damien. How are duodenal trauma managed? A French nationwide study.. World journal of emergency surgery : WJES. 2025. DOI: 10.1186/s13017-025-00661-z.

Предметные рубрики MeSH

Подготовка и перевод публикации
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…

История · было → стало

Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.

Тип публикации указан по данным источника. Уровень доказательности автоматически не присваивается.