Experimental gerontology · 2024
Dynamic observation and analysis of factors influencing the progression of diabetic retinopathy.
СтатьяНазвание и аннотация: Перевод пока не подготовлен
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…
Ошибки и ограничения
История · было → стало
Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.
Zhao Ying, Liu Da-Chuan
Аннотация
OBJECTIVE: To actively monitor and analyze the factors that affect the advancement of diabetic retinopathy (DR).
METHOD: In this study, we prospectively recruited patients diagnosed with non-proliferative diabetic retinopathy (NPDR) for concurrent monitoring. A total of 75 patients who transitioned from NPDR to proliferative diabetic retinopathy (PDR) comprised the progression group, while 112 NPDR patients who did not develop PDR formed the stable group in a prospective cohort study. Follow-up assessments occurred every six months, and patients were observed continuously over an eight-year period. Clinical parameters from both NPDR and PDR groups were collected to assess the stability of these indicators (with a coefficient of variation [CV] > 5 % indicating instability and CV < 5 % indicating stability).
RESULTS: In the NPDR cohort, 80.4 % Control the stability ratio regulation of glycosylated hemoglobin (HbA1c), whereas in the PDR cohort, 80.0 % Control the proportion of instability (P = 0.001); for blood creatinine (Cr), 64.3 % of NPDR patients maintained stable levels, contrasting with 77.3 % of PDR patients with fluctuating levels (P = 0.001). Blood urea nitrogen (BUN) and homocysteine (HCY) control demonstrated instability in both NPDR and PDR groups. Instability in regulating HbA1c, Cr, BUN, and HCY served as independent risk factors for DR progression, with significant associations found between HbA1c CV (HR: 15.586; 95 % CI: 14.205-15.988; p = 0.001), Cr CV (HR: 9.231; 95 % CI: 9.088-10.235; p = 0.005), BUN CV (HR: 3.568; 95 % CI: 3.183-4.367; p = 0.01), and HCY CV (HR: 8.678; 95 % CI: 7.754-8.998；p = 0.003).
CONCLUSION: Inadequate regulation of HbA1c, Cr, BUN, and HCY independently impact the advancement of DR.
METHOD: In this study, we prospectively recruited patients diagnosed with non-proliferative diabetic retinopathy (NPDR) for concurrent monitoring. A total of 75 patients who transitioned from NPDR to proliferative diabetic retinopathy (PDR) comprised the progression group, while 112 NPDR patients who did not develop PDR formed the stable group in a prospective cohort study. Follow-up assessments occurred every six months, and patients were observed continuously over an eight-year period. Clinical parameters from both NPDR and PDR groups were collected to assess the stability of these indicators (with a coefficient of variation [CV] > 5 % indicating instability and CV < 5 % indicating stability).
RESULTS: In the NPDR cohort, 80.4 % Control the stability ratio regulation of glycosylated hemoglobin (HbA1c), whereas in the PDR cohort, 80.0 % Control the proportion of instability (P = 0.001); for blood creatinine (Cr), 64.3 % of NPDR patients maintained stable levels, contrasting with 77.3 % of PDR patients with fluctuating levels (P = 0.001). Blood urea nitrogen (BUN) and homocysteine (HCY) control demonstrated instability in both NPDR and PDR groups. Instability in regulating HbA1c, Cr, BUN, and HCY served as independent risk factors for DR progression, with significant associations found between HbA1c CV (HR: 15.586; 95 % CI: 14.205-15.988; p = 0.001), Cr CV (HR: 9.231; 95 % CI: 9.088-10.235; p = 0.005), BUN CV (HR: 3.568; 95 % CI: 3.183-4.367; p = 0.01), and HCY CV (HR: 8.678; 95 % CI: 7.754-8.998；p = 0.003).
CONCLUSION: Inadequate regulation of HbA1c, Cr, BUN, and HCY independently impact the advancement of DR.