The journal of international advanced otology · 2022
Worldwide Variation in Cochlear Implant Candidacy.
СтатьяНазвание и аннотация: Перевод пока не подготовлен
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…
Ошибки и ограничения
История · было → стало
Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.
Van de Heyning Paul, Gavilán Javier, Godey Benoît, Hagen Rudolf, Hagr Abdulrahman, Kameswaran Mohan, Li Yongxin, Manoj Manikoth, Mlynski Robert, O'Driscoll Martin, Pillsbury Harold, Raine Christopher H, Rajan Gunesh, Schmutzhard Joachim, Staecker Hinrich
Аннотация
BACKGROUND: The aim of this study was to find out how candidacy criteria have evolved differently across the globe.
METHODS: Candidacy criteria and outcome measurements applied in 19 HEARRING clinics were analyzed.
RESULTS: Candidacy criteria vary between clinics. Overall, both bilateral implantation and cochlear implantation in patients with single-sided deafness are becoming more frequent.
CONCLUSION: Standardized outcome measurement instruments need to be applied to provide access to the hearing world to all patients with hearing loss who would benefit from cochlear implantation.
METHODS: Candidacy criteria and outcome measurements applied in 19 HEARRING clinics were analyzed.
RESULTS: Candidacy criteria vary between clinics. Overall, both bilateral implantation and cochlear implantation in patients with single-sided deafness are becoming more frequent.
CONCLUSION: Standardized outcome measurement instruments need to be applied to provide access to the hearing world to all patients with hearing loss who would benefit from cochlear implantation.