Photodermatology, photoimmunology & photomedicine · 2021
A clinical study of carbon dioxide lattice laser-assisted or microneedle-assisted 5-aminolevulinic acid-based photodynamic therapy for the treatment of hypertrophic acne scars.
СтатьяНазвание и аннотация: Перевод пока не подготовлен
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…
Ошибки и ограничения
История · было → стало
Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.
Yan Dongmei, Zhao Hongyi, Li Chenxi, Xia Aiting, Zhang Jiaojiao, Zhang Si, Yun Qing, Li Xiaoxin, Huang Feng, Tian Yan
Аннотация
OBJECTIVE: To study the clinical efficacy, recurrence rate and safety of 5-aminolevulinic acid-based photodynamic therapy (ALA-PDT) combined with microneedle or CO2 lattice laser (CO2FL), in comparison with intrascar betamethasone injection in the treatment of hypertrophic acne scar.
METHODS: Fifty-two patients with hypertrophic acne scars at the mandibular angle were enrolled and assigned to different therapy groups. Sixteen patients were treated with microneedle-assisted incorporation of ALA. Twenty-eight patients underwent CO2FL-assisted incorporation of ALA. Eight patients received standard therapy with intrascar injection of glucocorticoid. Two dermatologists, blinded to the therapy groups, independently evaluated the scars in all patients using the average value of the Vancouver Scar Scale score, which was treated as an integer variable.
RESULTS: After three rounds of treatment, there was no significant difference in therapeutic effective rate among the microneedle, laser and topical glucocorticoid groups (93.75% vs 100% vs 100%, P = .855). One out of 16 patients (6.25%) in the microneedle group, no patient (0%) in the laser group and two out of eight patients (25%) in the topical glucocorticoid group had recurrence. The laser group showed a higher rate of adverse effects, which were usually mild and reversible, except for pigmentation. Adverse reactions could be completely subsided within 3 weeks.
CONCLUSIONS: Either CO2FL or microneedle combined ALA-PDT for hypertrophic scar, as to topical glucocorticoid therapy, showed equivalent clinical effects but lower recurrence rate within 6 months of follow-up period.
METHODS: Fifty-two patients with hypertrophic acne scars at the mandibular angle were enrolled and assigned to different therapy groups. Sixteen patients were treated with microneedle-assisted incorporation of ALA. Twenty-eight patients underwent CO2FL-assisted incorporation of ALA. Eight patients received standard therapy with intrascar injection of glucocorticoid. Two dermatologists, blinded to the therapy groups, independently evaluated the scars in all patients using the average value of the Vancouver Scar Scale score, which was treated as an integer variable.
RESULTS: After three rounds of treatment, there was no significant difference in therapeutic effective rate among the microneedle, laser and topical glucocorticoid groups (93.75% vs 100% vs 100%, P = .855). One out of 16 patients (6.25%) in the microneedle group, no patient (0%) in the laser group and two out of eight patients (25%) in the topical glucocorticoid group had recurrence. The laser group showed a higher rate of adverse effects, which were usually mild and reversible, except for pigmentation. Adverse reactions could be completely subsided within 3 weeks.
CONCLUSIONS: Either CO2FL or microneedle combined ALA-PDT for hypertrophic scar, as to topical glucocorticoid therapy, showed equivalent clinical effects but lower recurrence rate within 6 months of follow-up period.