Haematologica · 2002
Attempt to improve the diagnosis of immune thrombocytopenia by combined use of two different platelet autoantibodies assays (PAIgG and MACE).
СтатьяПоддержка исследования: вне правительства СШАНазвание и аннотация: Перевод пока не подготовлен
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…
Ошибки и ограничения
История · было → стало
Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.
Fabris Fabrizio, Scandellari Raffaella, Randi Maria Luigia, Carraro Gianni, Luzzatto Guido, Girolami Antonio
Аннотация
BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES: Despite an extensive search for a definitive diagnostic assay for platelet autoantibodies, the laboratory diagnosis of immune thrombocytopenia (ITP) still remains a clinical challenge. Data in the literature have so far demonstrated that measurement of platelet-associated IgG (PAIgG) is sensitive, especially when flow cytometry is employed, but lacks adequate specificity. Measuring specific autoantibodies by antigen capture techniques increases specificity, but a large part of patients escape autoantibodies detection by such means too. The aim of the present study was to compare the diagnostic value of PAIgG with a modified antigen capture ELISA (MACE) in patients with primary and secondary immune thrombocytopenia and in patients with non-immune thrombocytopenia.
DESIGN AND METHODS: One hundred and four patients with a platelet count lower than 100x109/L were studied. Forty-two patients had primary ITP (P-ITP), 23 patients had ITP secondary to other immune diseases (S-ITP) and 39 patients had thrombocytopenia due to decreased platelet production (non-immune; NITP). PAIgG was measured by immunofluorescent flow cytometry, whereas specific platelet-associated autoantibodies (against GP IIb/IIIa, Ib/IX, Ia/Ia) were measured by a commercially available modified antigen capture assay (MACE, GTI, USA).
RESULTS: The sensitivity of the PAIgG assay for ITP was 60%, the specificity was 77%, the positive predictive value was 81% and the negative predictive value was 54%. The sensitivity of MACE was 60%, specificity was 97%, the positive predictive value 97% and the negative predictive value 59%. We found a 73% concordance between PAIgG and MACE assays. Both PAIgG and MACE had significantly greater sensitivity in S-ITP than in P-ITP.
INTERPRETATION AND CONCLUSIONS: Forty percent of patients with clinically diagnosed immune thrombocytopenia had no detectable platelet autoantibodies, possibly because of intrinsic methodological detection problems, different stages of disease, or absence of a true immune etiology.
DESIGN AND METHODS: One hundred and four patients with a platelet count lower than 100x109/L were studied. Forty-two patients had primary ITP (P-ITP), 23 patients had ITP secondary to other immune diseases (S-ITP) and 39 patients had thrombocytopenia due to decreased platelet production (non-immune; NITP). PAIgG was measured by immunofluorescent flow cytometry, whereas specific platelet-associated autoantibodies (against GP IIb/IIIa, Ib/IX, Ia/Ia) were measured by a commercially available modified antigen capture assay (MACE, GTI, USA).
RESULTS: The sensitivity of the PAIgG assay for ITP was 60%, the specificity was 77%, the positive predictive value was 81% and the negative predictive value was 54%. The sensitivity of MACE was 60%, specificity was 97%, the positive predictive value 97% and the negative predictive value 59%. We found a 73% concordance between PAIgG and MACE assays. Both PAIgG and MACE had significantly greater sensitivity in S-ITP than in P-ITP.
INTERPRETATION AND CONCLUSIONS: Forty percent of patients with clinically diagnosed immune thrombocytopenia had no detectable platelet autoantibodies, possibly because of intrinsic methodological detection problems, different stages of disease, or absence of a true immune etiology.