Cancer · 2002
Docetaxel plus epidoxorubicin as neoadjuvant treatment in patients with large operable or locally advanced carcinoma of the breast: a single-center, phase II study.
Клиническое исследованиеКлиническое исследование II фазыСтатьяПоддержка исследования: вне правительства СШАНазвание и аннотация: Перевод пока не подготовлен
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…
Ошибки и ограничения
История · было → стало
Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.
de Matteis Andrea, Nuzzo Francesco, D'Aiuto Giuseppe, Labonia Vincenzo, Landi Gabriella, Rossi Emanuela, Mastro Angelo Antonio, Botti Gerardo, De Maio Ermelinda, Perrone Francesco
Аннотация
BACKGROUND: The objective of this study was to test the activity and toxicity of epirubicin plus docetaxel as primary chemotherapy for women with large, operable (T2; > 3 cm) or locally advanced (Stage III) breast carcinoma, including patients with inflammatory breast carcinoma.
METHODS: In this single-center, open-label, single-stage, Phase II trial, epirubicin (75 mg/m(2); intravenous bolus) followed by docetaxel (80 mg/m(2); 1-hour intravenous infusion) was administered on Day 1 of each cycle for four cycles.
RESULTS: Nine of 30 patients (30%) had inflammatory breast carcinoma. Twenty-three patients (76.7%; 95% confidence interval, 57.7-90.1) had a clinical objective response that was complete in 6 patients (20%). Twenty-seven patients (90%) underwent surgery that was conservative in 5 patients (16.7%). Pathologic response evaluation revealed four complete responses (13.3%; 95% confidence interval, 3.8-30.7). Grade 4 neutropenia was recorded in 80.0% of patients, and febrile neutropenia was recorded in one-third of patients. Anemia and thrombocytopenia were never severe. Other side effects were diarrhea (26.6%), oral mucositis (43.3%), and emesis (26.6%).
CONCLUSIONS: Neoadjuvant chemotherapy with epirubicin plus docetaxel was a feasible treatment and was active in an unfavorable series of patients with locally advanced breast carcinoma, including patients with inflammatory breast carcinoma.
METHODS: In this single-center, open-label, single-stage, Phase II trial, epirubicin (75 mg/m(2); intravenous bolus) followed by docetaxel (80 mg/m(2); 1-hour intravenous infusion) was administered on Day 1 of each cycle for four cycles.
RESULTS: Nine of 30 patients (30%) had inflammatory breast carcinoma. Twenty-three patients (76.7%; 95% confidence interval, 57.7-90.1) had a clinical objective response that was complete in 6 patients (20%). Twenty-seven patients (90%) underwent surgery that was conservative in 5 patients (16.7%). Pathologic response evaluation revealed four complete responses (13.3%; 95% confidence interval, 3.8-30.7). Grade 4 neutropenia was recorded in 80.0% of patients, and febrile neutropenia was recorded in one-third of patients. Anemia and thrombocytopenia were never severe. Other side effects were diarrhea (26.6%), oral mucositis (43.3%), and emesis (26.6%).
CONCLUSIONS: Neoadjuvant chemotherapy with epirubicin plus docetaxel was a feasible treatment and was active in an unfavorable series of patients with locally advanced breast carcinoma, including patients with inflammatory breast carcinoma.