Retinal cases & brief reports · 2016
CONCURRENT SCLERAL BUCKLE AND INTRAVITREAL BEVACIZUMAB FOR ADVANCED RETINOPATHY OF PREMATURITY-RELATED RETINAL DETACHMENT.
СтатьяНазвание и аннотация: Перевод пока не подготовлен
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…
Ошибки и ограничения
История · было → стало
Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.
Shah Rohan J, Garcia-Gonzalez Jose M, Blair Michael P, Galasso John, Shapiro Michael J
Аннотация
BACKGROUND: The preoperative use of intravitreal bevacizumab in Stage 4 or 5 retinopathy of prematurity (ROP) can reduce vascular endothelial growth factor load and bleeding risk; however, it can induce traction and exacerbate a tractional retinal detachment. Concurrent placement of a scleral buckle may reduce these risks and obviate future vitrectomy.
METHODS: A retrospective analysis of eyes treated for Stage 4 and 5 ROP with concurrent intravitreal bevacizumab and scleral buckle was performed. Retinal reattachment and need for vitrectomy were studied.
RESULTS: Thirteen eyes from 10 infants were treated with concurrent intravitreal bevacizumab and scleral buckle. Nine eyes were Stage 4a, 2 were Stage 4b, and 2 were Stage 5. All eyes with Stage 4 ROP achieved macular attachment at last follow-up. All the eyes with 4a ROP achieved retinal reattachment: 4 (44.4%) with buckle alone and 5 (55.6%) with subsequent vitrectomy. All 4 eyes with Stage 4b or 5 ROP required vitrectomy.
CONCLUSION: Concurrent intravitreal bevacizumab and scleral buckle may serve as a bridge to vitrectomy and, in some instances, may obviate the need for subsequent intervention.
METHODS: A retrospective analysis of eyes treated for Stage 4 and 5 ROP with concurrent intravitreal bevacizumab and scleral buckle was performed. Retinal reattachment and need for vitrectomy were studied.
RESULTS: Thirteen eyes from 10 infants were treated with concurrent intravitreal bevacizumab and scleral buckle. Nine eyes were Stage 4a, 2 were Stage 4b, and 2 were Stage 5. All eyes with Stage 4 ROP achieved macular attachment at last follow-up. All the eyes with 4a ROP achieved retinal reattachment: 4 (44.4%) with buckle alone and 5 (55.6%) with subsequent vitrectomy. All 4 eyes with Stage 4b or 5 ROP required vitrectomy.
CONCLUSION: Concurrent intravitreal bevacizumab and scleral buckle may serve as a bridge to vitrectomy and, in some instances, may obviate the need for subsequent intervention.