MedElevator Войти в исследования
← Поиск публикаций

DOI 10.3928/23258160-20141118-05

Медицинская библиотека · Ophthalmic surgery, lasers & imaging retina · 2014

Frequency of vitreomacular interface disease in patients presenting to a tertiary care institution.

Xu Lucy T, Punjabi Omar S, Shao Jack, Ehlers Justis P, Srivastava Sunil K, Singh Rishi P, Kaiser Peter K

СтатьяПоддержка исследования: вне правительства СШАПеревод пока не подготовлен

Аннотация

BACKGROUND AND

OBJECTIVE

To evaluate the frequency of vitreomacular interface disease using a recently published optical coherence tomography (OCT) classification and assess which of these patients would qualify for ocriplasmin.

PATIENTS AND

METHODS

A retrospective, consecutive case series of patients with macular cyst, hole, or pseudohole (ICD-9 code 362.54) and concurrent OCT imaging was performed. Eyes were classified using OCT as pseudohole, lamellar hole, vitreomacular adhesion (VMA), vitreomacular traction (VMT), and full-thickness macular hole (FTMH). Minimum diameter (MD) of FTMH was measured.

RESULTS

The study included 399 eyes of 331 patients. Of these, 61 eyes (15.3%) had VMA or VMT, 120 (30.0%) had a lamellar hole or pseudohole, and 218 (54.6%) had FTMH. Of eyes with FTMH, 73 were small (< 250 µm MD), 48 were medium (250 to 400 µm MD), and 97 were large (> 400 µm MD). Overall, 68 eyes (17.0%) would be candidates for ocriplasmin therapy.

CONCLUSION

Most patients had FTMH, and 17% would qualify as candidates for ocriplasmin therapy.

Для цитирования: Xu Lucy T, Punjabi Omar S, Shao Jack, Ehlers Justis P, Srivastava Sunil K, Singh Rishi P, Kaiser Peter K. Frequency of vitreomacular interface disease in patients presenting to a tertiary care institution.. Ophthalmic surgery, lasers & imaging retina. 2014. DOI: 10.3928/23258160-20141118-05.

Предметные рубрики MeSH

Подготовка и перевод публикации
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…

История · было → стало

Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.

Тип публикации указан по данным источника. Уровень доказательности автоматически не присваивается.