Radiotherapy and oncology : journal of the European Society for Therapeutic Radiology and Oncology · 2015
Refusal of postoperative radiotherapy and its association with survival in head and neck cancer.
СтатьяПоддержка исследования: вне правительства СШАНазвание и аннотация: Перевод пока не подготовлен
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…
Ошибки и ограничения
История · было → стало
Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.
Schwam Zachary G, Husain Zain, Judson Benjamin L
Аннотация
BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE: Administering postoperative radiotherapy (PORT) is associated with improved survival and slower disease progression in select head and neck cancer patients. Predictive factors for PORT refusal have not been described in this population.
MATERIALS AND METHODS: Retrospective analysis of 6127 head and neck cancer patients who received or refused PORT in the National Cancer Database (2003-2006) was performed. Statistical analysis included Chi-square, multivariable logistic regression, Kaplan-Meier, and Cox proportional hazards analysis.
RESULTS: In total, 247 patients (4.0%) refused PORT. Three-year overall survival was 62.8% versus 53.4% for those who received and refused PORT, respectively. PORT refusers were more likely to have negative nodes than those who underwent PORT (37.4% versus 20.1%, p<.001). In multivariate analysis, predictive factors for refusing PORT included living far from the treatment facility (OR 1.92), having negative nodes (OR 2.14), and Charlson score of ⩾ 2 (OR 2.14) (all p ⩽.001). PORT refusal was associated with increased mortality (hazard ratio 1.20, p=.044).
CONCLUSIONS: A significant proportion of head and neck cancer patients refused PORT; this was associated with compromised overall survival. Predictive factors for PORT refusal included socioeconomic, demographic, and pathologic variables. Elucidating root causes of refusal may lead to interventions that improve long-term outcomes.
MATERIALS AND METHODS: Retrospective analysis of 6127 head and neck cancer patients who received or refused PORT in the National Cancer Database (2003-2006) was performed. Statistical analysis included Chi-square, multivariable logistic regression, Kaplan-Meier, and Cox proportional hazards analysis.
RESULTS: In total, 247 patients (4.0%) refused PORT. Three-year overall survival was 62.8% versus 53.4% for those who received and refused PORT, respectively. PORT refusers were more likely to have negative nodes than those who underwent PORT (37.4% versus 20.1%, p<.001). In multivariate analysis, predictive factors for refusing PORT included living far from the treatment facility (OR 1.92), having negative nodes (OR 2.14), and Charlson score of ⩾ 2 (OR 2.14) (all p ⩽.001). PORT refusal was associated with increased mortality (hazard ratio 1.20, p=.044).
CONCLUSIONS: A significant proportion of head and neck cancer patients refused PORT; this was associated with compromised overall survival. Predictive factors for PORT refusal included socioeconomic, demographic, and pathologic variables. Elucidating root causes of refusal may lead to interventions that improve long-term outcomes.