MedElevator Войти в исследования
← Поиск публикаций

DOI 10.1038/sc.2010.84

Медицинская библиотека · Spinal cord · 2010

Guillian-Barré syndrome in high tetraplegia following acute respiratory illness.

Grant C, Briscoe N, Mezei M, Krassioukov A

Клинический случайСтатьяПеревод пока не подготовлен

Аннотация

STUDY

DESIGN

A case report of a Guillain-Barré syndrome (GBS) variant presenting in a patient with a high cervical spinal cord injury (SCI).

OBJECTIVES

To illustrate a clinical presentation of GBS in an individual with chronic SCI.

SETTING

Vancouver General Hospital, Vancouver, BC, Canada.

METHODS/

RESULTS

A 31-year-old man with chronic C2 AIS B (American Spinal Injury Association Impairment Scale) SCI and diaphragmatic pacing presented with respiratory failure with sepsis. His sepsis resolved with antibiotic therapy, but he continued to have autonomic instability and was unable to be weaned off his ventilator. Concurrently he developed flaccidity and facial diplegia. Investigations including nerve conduction studies and cerebrospinal fluid analysis prompted a diagnosis of acute motor-sensory axonal neuropathy, a variant of Guillian-Barré syndrome. Owing to ongoing autonomic instability, he was treated with intravenous immunoglobulin. His autonomic dysfunction resolved and he regained some facial muscle function, but 6 months post injury he remained dysphagic and required 24-h ventilator support.

CONCLUSION

Careful neurological reassessment prompted the diagnosis of acute polyradiculoneuropathy following respiratory sepsis as the root cause of diaphragmatic pacer failure and autonomic instability.

Для цитирования: Grant C, Briscoe N, Mezei M, Krassioukov A. Guillian-Barré syndrome in high tetraplegia following acute respiratory illness.. Spinal cord. 2010. DOI: 10.1038/sc.2010.84.

Предметные рубрики MeSH

Подготовка и перевод публикации
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…

История · было → стало

Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.

Тип публикации указан по данным источника. Уровень доказательности автоматически не присваивается.