Acta informatica medica : AIM : journal of the Society for Medical Informatics of Bosnia & Herzegovina : casopis Drustva za medicinsku informatiku BiH · 2025
Clinical Outcomes of Off-Pump Coronary Artery Bypass Grafting With and Without Posterior Pericardiotomy: Impact on Pleural and Pericardial Effusions.
СтатьяНазвание и аннотация: Перевод пока не подготовлен
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…
Ошибки и ограничения
История · было → стало
Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.
Karic Alen, Tabakovic Mustafa, Krajnovic Alma, Busevac Ervin, Malesic Nada, Milaimi Amar, Sljivo Armin
Аннотация
BACKGROUND: Posterior pericardiotomy has been proposed to prevent postoperative pericardial effusion and tamponade in coronary artery bypass grafting, but its effect on pleural fluid accumulation during off-pump CABG (OPCAB) is not well defined.
OBJECTIVE: To compare intraoperative metrics and early postoperative outcomes-particularly rates of pleural and pericardial effusions-between OPCAB with and without posterior pericardiotomy.
METHODS: In this retrospective cohort, 68 patients underwent OPCAB from January to March 2025 and were stratified into pericardiotomy (n = 38) and control (n = 30) groups. Baseline demographics, comorbidities, left ventricular ejection fraction, operative time, and graft count were recorded. Postoperative outcomes included incidence of pericardial and pleural effusions (confirmed by echocardiography or chest radiography), new-onset atrial fibrillation (within seven days), chest-tube drainage volume, and in-hospital mortality.
RESULTS: Groups were similar in age (mean 66.5 ± 7.1 years), sex, and major comorbidities, though peripheral artery disease and multi-vessel coronary disease were more prevalent in the pericardiotomy group (p = 0.002 and p = 0.017). Operative time and ICU stay did not differ significantly. Mediastinal drainage was higher after pericardiotomy (861 ± 551 vs. 764 ± 347 mL; p = 0.03). Pericardial effusion rates were low and comparable (10.5% vs. 13.3%; p = 0.72), and no tamponade occurred. Pleural effusions were significantly more frequent with pericardiotomy (42.1% vs. 6.6%; p = 0.001). Atrial fibrillation incidence and in-hospital mortality were similar between groups.
CONCLUSIONS: Posterior pericardiotomy in OPCAB effectively prevents clinically significant pericardial effusion and tamponade, though it redirects fluid into the pleural space, increasing pleural effusion rates. These effusions are manageable with routine drainage and do not prolong recovery. Prospective studies should further define patient selection and long-term implications.
OBJECTIVE: To compare intraoperative metrics and early postoperative outcomes-particularly rates of pleural and pericardial effusions-between OPCAB with and without posterior pericardiotomy.
METHODS: In this retrospective cohort, 68 patients underwent OPCAB from January to March 2025 and were stratified into pericardiotomy (n = 38) and control (n = 30) groups. Baseline demographics, comorbidities, left ventricular ejection fraction, operative time, and graft count were recorded. Postoperative outcomes included incidence of pericardial and pleural effusions (confirmed by echocardiography or chest radiography), new-onset atrial fibrillation (within seven days), chest-tube drainage volume, and in-hospital mortality.
RESULTS: Groups were similar in age (mean 66.5 ± 7.1 years), sex, and major comorbidities, though peripheral artery disease and multi-vessel coronary disease were more prevalent in the pericardiotomy group (p = 0.002 and p = 0.017). Operative time and ICU stay did not differ significantly. Mediastinal drainage was higher after pericardiotomy (861 ± 551 vs. 764 ± 347 mL; p = 0.03). Pericardial effusion rates were low and comparable (10.5% vs. 13.3%; p = 0.72), and no tamponade occurred. Pleural effusions were significantly more frequent with pericardiotomy (42.1% vs. 6.6%; p = 0.001). Atrial fibrillation incidence and in-hospital mortality were similar between groups.
CONCLUSIONS: Posterior pericardiotomy in OPCAB effectively prevents clinically significant pericardial effusion and tamponade, though it redirects fluid into the pleural space, increasing pleural effusion rates. These effusions are manageable with routine drainage and do not prolong recovery. Prospective studies should further define patient selection and long-term implications.