World journal of diabetes · 2025
Associations of nontraditional lipoprotein ratios with future cardiovascular events in patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus.
СтатьяНазвание и аннотация: Перевод пока не подготовлен
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…
Ошибки и ограничения
История · было → стало
Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.
Deng Si-Min, Hu Xin-Qun, Zhang Xiang-Yu
Аннотация
BACKGROUND: Patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM) face a heightened risk of future cardiovascular events. It is therefore important to stratify these patients according to their future cardiovascular event risk to allow early intervention and improve prognosis. Recent proposals have indicated that nontraditional lipoprotein ratios may be superior predictors of cardiovascular events compared to traditional lipid parameters. However, further evidence is required for widespread clinical application.
AIM: To elucidate the associations of nontraditional lipoprotein ratios with future cardiovascular events in patients with T2DM.
METHODS: This study performed post-hoc analysis of data obtained during a clinical trial involving 10182 participants. To ascertain the correlations between nontraditional lipoprotein ratios and future cardiovascular events, including major adverse cardiovascular events (MACEs) and congestive heart failure (CHF). We employed univariable and multivariable-adjusted Cox proportional hazards regression models. Potential dose-response relationships and threshold values were explored by conducting restricted cubic spline analyses and two-piecewise linear regression models. Possible relevant interactions influencing independent relationships were tested using subgroup and interaction analyses.
RESULTS: After adjustment for confounding factors, all nontraditional lipoprotein ratios studied were strongly associated with MACE risk in patients with T2DM. In comparison with patients in the lowest quartile, the hazard ratios (95% confidence intervals) of those in the highest quartile were 1.50 (1.29-1.73), 1.51 (1.30-1.74), 1.50 (1.29-1.73), and 1.30 (1.12-1.50) for total cholesterol/high-density lipoprotein cholesterol (HDL-C), low-density lipoprotein cholesterol/HDL-C, non-HDL-C/HDL-C, and remnant cholesterol/HDL-C, respectively. Similar findings were noted for CHF. Dose-response relationships between nontraditional lipoprotein ratios and MACE were observed, with threshold values of 7.29, 6.29, and 2.15 for total cholesterol/HDL-C, non-HDL-C/HDL-C, and remnant cholesterol/HDL-C, respectively. However, no notable dose-response relationships were detected between nontraditional lipoprotein ratios and CHF.
CONCLUSION: Elevated nontraditional lipoprotein ratios may independently predict the risk of MACE and CHF in patients with T2DM.
AIM: To elucidate the associations of nontraditional lipoprotein ratios with future cardiovascular events in patients with T2DM.
METHODS: This study performed post-hoc analysis of data obtained during a clinical trial involving 10182 participants. To ascertain the correlations between nontraditional lipoprotein ratios and future cardiovascular events, including major adverse cardiovascular events (MACEs) and congestive heart failure (CHF). We employed univariable and multivariable-adjusted Cox proportional hazards regression models. Potential dose-response relationships and threshold values were explored by conducting restricted cubic spline analyses and two-piecewise linear regression models. Possible relevant interactions influencing independent relationships were tested using subgroup and interaction analyses.
RESULTS: After adjustment for confounding factors, all nontraditional lipoprotein ratios studied were strongly associated with MACE risk in patients with T2DM. In comparison with patients in the lowest quartile, the hazard ratios (95% confidence intervals) of those in the highest quartile were 1.50 (1.29-1.73), 1.51 (1.30-1.74), 1.50 (1.29-1.73), and 1.30 (1.12-1.50) for total cholesterol/high-density lipoprotein cholesterol (HDL-C), low-density lipoprotein cholesterol/HDL-C, non-HDL-C/HDL-C, and remnant cholesterol/HDL-C, respectively. Similar findings were noted for CHF. Dose-response relationships between nontraditional lipoprotein ratios and MACE were observed, with threshold values of 7.29, 6.29, and 2.15 for total cholesterol/HDL-C, non-HDL-C/HDL-C, and remnant cholesterol/HDL-C, respectively. However, no notable dose-response relationships were detected between nontraditional lipoprotein ratios and CHF.
CONCLUSION: Elevated nontraditional lipoprotein ratios may independently predict the risk of MACE and CHF in patients with T2DM.