Clinical microbiology and infection : the official publication of the European Society of Clinical Microbiology and Infectious Diseases · 2017
Efficacy and acceptability of rectal and perineal sampling for identifying gastrointestinal colonization with extended spectrum β-lactamase Enterobacteriaceae.
Сравнительное исследованиеОценочное исследованиеСтатьяНазвание и аннотация: Перевод пока не подготовлен
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…
Ошибки и ограничения
История · было → стало
Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.
Dyakova E, Bisnauthsing K N, Querol-Rubiera A, Patel A, Ahanonu C, Tosas Auguet O, Edgeworth J D, Goldenberg S D, Otter J A
Аннотация
OBJECTIVES: We evaluated 'pre-laboratory' factors associated with the detection of extended spectrum β-lactamase-producing Enterobacteriaceae (ESBL-E) colonization including anatomical site, and staff and patient factors.
METHODS: All admissions to a large London hospital over 3 months were approached to provide rectal and perineal swabs, which were cultured for ESBL-E using chromogenic media. ESBL-E detection rates for patient- or staff-collected rectal or perineal swabs were compared using McNemar tests. Binary logistic regression was used to explore factors associated with patients declining to provide a rectal swab. The impact of simplifying the verbal study description to patients to improve the participation rate was evaluated.
RESULTS: Carriage of ESBL-E was significantly higher in rectal swabs than perineal swabs (7.8% of 4006 versus 3.8% of 4006, p <0.001), whether collected by staff or patients; 31.9% of 869 patients did not provide a rectal swab before the change in study description compared with 7.6% of 3690 patients afterwards (p <0.001). In multivariable analysis, factors associated with patients declining to provide a rectal swab were younger age (OR 0.99, 95% CI 0.99-1.00), female gender (OR 1.26, 95% CI 1.04-1.52), transfers from other hospitals (OR 1.77, 95% CI 1.07-2.93) or an unknown admission route (OR 1.61, 95% CI 1.09-2.37), being admitted before the change in study description (OR 0.39, 95% CI 0.31-0.48), and the staff member who consented the patient (p <0.001); ethnicity was not a significant factor.
CONCLUSIONS: Rectal swabs are recommended for the detection of ESBL-E colonization. Staff and patient factors influence whether patients participate in prevalence studies, which may skew their findings.
METHODS: All admissions to a large London hospital over 3 months were approached to provide rectal and perineal swabs, which were cultured for ESBL-E using chromogenic media. ESBL-E detection rates for patient- or staff-collected rectal or perineal swabs were compared using McNemar tests. Binary logistic regression was used to explore factors associated with patients declining to provide a rectal swab. The impact of simplifying the verbal study description to patients to improve the participation rate was evaluated.
RESULTS: Carriage of ESBL-E was significantly higher in rectal swabs than perineal swabs (7.8% of 4006 versus 3.8% of 4006, p <0.001), whether collected by staff or patients; 31.9% of 869 patients did not provide a rectal swab before the change in study description compared with 7.6% of 3690 patients afterwards (p <0.001). In multivariable analysis, factors associated with patients declining to provide a rectal swab were younger age (OR 0.99, 95% CI 0.99-1.00), female gender (OR 1.26, 95% CI 1.04-1.52), transfers from other hospitals (OR 1.77, 95% CI 1.07-2.93) or an unknown admission route (OR 1.61, 95% CI 1.09-2.37), being admitted before the change in study description (OR 0.39, 95% CI 0.31-0.48), and the staff member who consented the patient (p <0.001); ethnicity was not a significant factor.
CONCLUSIONS: Rectal swabs are recommended for the detection of ESBL-E colonization. Staff and patient factors influence whether patients participate in prevalence studies, which may skew their findings.