Correlation and predictive value of aortic root calcification markers with coronary artery calcification and obstructive coronary artery disease.

OBJECTIVE

To evaluate the correlation between aortic root calcification (ARC) markers and coronary artery calcification (CAC) derived from coronary artery calcium scoring (CACS) and their ability to predict obstructive coronary artery disease (CAD).

METHODS

We retrospectively analyzed 189 patients (47% male, age 60.3 ± 11.1 years) with an intermediate probability of CAD who underwent clinically indicated CACS and coronary CT angiography (CCTA). ARC markers [aortic root calcium score (ARCS) and volume (ARCV)] were calculated and compared to CAC markers: coronary artery calcium score (CACS), volume (CACV), and mass (CACM). CCTA datasets were visually evaluated for significant CAD (stenosis ≥ 50%) and the ability of ARC markers to predict obstructive CAD was assessed.

RESULTS

ARCS (mean 67.7 ± 189.5) and ARCV (mean 67.3 ± 184.7) showed significant differences between patients with and without CAC (109.4 ± 238.6 vs 9.42 ± 31.4, p < 0.0001; 108.5 ± 232.4 vs 9.9 ± 30.5, p < 0.0001). A strong correlation was found for ARCS and ARCV with CACS, CACM, and CACV (all p < 0.0001). In a multivariate analysis, ARCS (OR 1.09, p = 0.033) and ARCV (OR 1.12, p = 0.046) were independent markers for CAC. Using a receiver-operating characteristics analysis, the AUC to detect severe CAC was 0.71 (p < 0.0001) and 0.71 (p < 0.0001) for ARCS and ARCV, respectively. ARCS (0.67, p < 0.0001) and ARCV (0.68, p < 0.0001) showed discriminatory power for predicting obstructive CAD, yielding sensitivities 61 and 78% and specificities of 62 and 80%, respectively.

CONCLUSION

ARC markers are associated with and independently predict the presence of CAC and obstructive CAD. Further testing is required in patients with severe ARC and significant CAD in order to reliably obtain these markers from thoracic-CT or X-ray for proper risk classification.