MedElevator Войти в исследования
← Поиск публикаций

DOI 10.1007/bf02521402

Медицинская библиотека · Journal of mental health administration · 1993

Long-term follow-up of rural involuntary clients.

McFarland B H, Brunette M, Steketee K, Faulkner L R, Bloom J D

СтатьяПоддержка исследования: вне правительства СШАПоддержка службы здравоохранения СШАПеревод пока не подготовлен

Аннотация

A cohort of 72 persons who had entered a rural Oregon county's involuntary treatment system in 1979 through 1982 was followed for six years. While schizophrenia was the most frequent diagnosis, several other conditions were represented including adjustment disorders, organic mental disorders, and substance abuse. The majority (55%) of persons with organic mental disorders died as did 12% of the individuals with schizophrenia. The overall mortality rate was three times the expected figure (p = .002). During the follow-up period, only 39% of the initial cohort received treatment from a community mental health program whereas 28% were newly admitted (involuntarily) to a state mental hospital. Hospital recividism was most likely among individuals who had had prior involuntary treatment. At least in rural areas, the civil commitment system seems to serve both "infrequent" and "persistent" users. Infrequent users mainly have diagnoses of adjustment disorders and/or substance abuse. Persistent users chiefly have diagnoses of organic mental disorders, mood disorders, or schizophrenia. Modifying the involuntary treatment system to take account of this heterogeneous population's diverse needs is discussed.

Для цитирования: McFarland B H, Brunette M, Steketee K, Faulkner L R, Bloom J D. Long-term follow-up of rural involuntary clients.. Journal of mental health administration. 1993. DOI: 10.1007/bf02521402.

Предметные рубрики MeSH

Подготовка и перевод публикации
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…

История · было → стало

Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.

Тип публикации указан по данным источника. Уровень доказательности автоматически не присваивается.