JTCVS techniques · 2021
Improved visualization of virtual-assisted lung mapping by indocyanine green.
СтатьяНазвание и аннотация: Перевод пока не подготовлен
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…
Ошибки и ограничения
История · было → стало
Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.
Tokuno Junko, Chen-Yoshikawa Toyofumi F, Nakajima Daisuke, Aoyama Akihiro, Motoyama Hideki, Sato Masaaki, Date Hiroshi
Аннотация
OBJECTIVES: Virtual-assisted lung mapping (VAL-MAP) is a bronchoscopic marking method of dye application on the surface of the lungs before resecting nonpalpable nodules. However, in some cases, it can be difficult to identify the markings of VAL-MAP on computed tomography and intraoperative thoracoscopy. We developed and assessed the feasibility of indocyanine green VAL-MAP (ICG-VAL-MAP).
METHODS: A historical control trial was conducted to investigate the effectiveness of ICG-VAL-MAP for marking visualization compared with that of VAL-MAP. In ICG-VAL-MAP, instead of indigo carmine, ICG and computed tomography contrast agents were used for dye marking, and near-infrared fluorescence endoscopy was employed to visualize the ICG markings. The other processes in VAL-MAP were carried out. The marking visibility was assessed in 3 grades of easy, faint, or not identifiable. We compared the visibility of the markings on computed tomography images and during thoracoscopic operations between VAL-MAP (567 markings in 147 cases) and ICG-VAL-MAP (142 markings in 63 cases).
RESULTS: On the preoperative computed tomography images, ICG-VAL-MAP provided significantly better marking visualization than VAL-MAP (easy/faint/not identifiable = 142/0/0 vs 427/100/30; P < .0001). ICG-VAL-MAP provided significantly better intraoperative markings than VAL-MAP (easy/faint/not identifiable = 141/0/1, respectively, vs 475/50/42, respectively; P < .0001). Regarding complications, pneumothorax occurred in 8 (5.4%) cases of VAL-MAP and zero cases (0%) of ICG-VAL-MAP (P = .12); fever was observed in 7 (5.0%) cases of VAL-MAP and 2 (3.2%) cases of ICG-VAL-MAP (P = .72).
CONCLUSIONS: ICG-VAL-MAP provided significantly better visibility of markings than VAL-MAP. It might be useful in the resection of nonpalpable small lung lesions.
METHODS: A historical control trial was conducted to investigate the effectiveness of ICG-VAL-MAP for marking visualization compared with that of VAL-MAP. In ICG-VAL-MAP, instead of indigo carmine, ICG and computed tomography contrast agents were used for dye marking, and near-infrared fluorescence endoscopy was employed to visualize the ICG markings. The other processes in VAL-MAP were carried out. The marking visibility was assessed in 3 grades of easy, faint, or not identifiable. We compared the visibility of the markings on computed tomography images and during thoracoscopic operations between VAL-MAP (567 markings in 147 cases) and ICG-VAL-MAP (142 markings in 63 cases).
RESULTS: On the preoperative computed tomography images, ICG-VAL-MAP provided significantly better marking visualization than VAL-MAP (easy/faint/not identifiable = 142/0/0 vs 427/100/30; P < .0001). ICG-VAL-MAP provided significantly better intraoperative markings than VAL-MAP (easy/faint/not identifiable = 141/0/1, respectively, vs 475/50/42, respectively; P < .0001). Regarding complications, pneumothorax occurred in 8 (5.4%) cases of VAL-MAP and zero cases (0%) of ICG-VAL-MAP (P = .12); fever was observed in 7 (5.0%) cases of VAL-MAP and 2 (3.2%) cases of ICG-VAL-MAP (P = .72).
CONCLUSIONS: ICG-VAL-MAP provided significantly better visibility of markings than VAL-MAP. It might be useful in the resection of nonpalpable small lung lesions.