Radiology. Artificial intelligence · 2021
Deep Learning Systems for Pneumothorax Detection on Chest Radiographs: A Multicenter External Validation Study.
СтатьяНазвание и аннотация: Перевод пока не подготовлен
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…
Ошибки и ограничения
История · было → стало
Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.
Thian Yee Liang, Ng Dianwen, Hallinan James Thomas Patrick Decourcy, Jagmohan Pooja, Sia Soon Yiew, Tan Cher Heng, Ting Yong Han, Kei Pin Lin, Pulickal Geoiphy George, Tiong Vincent Tze Yang, Quek Swee Tian, Feng Mengling
Аннотация
PURPOSE: To assess the generalizability of a deep learning pneumothorax detection model on datasets from multiple external institutions and examine patient and acquisition factors that might influence performance.
MATERIALS AND METHODS: In this retrospective study, a deep learning model was trained for pneumothorax detection by merging two large open-source chest radiograph datasets: ChestX-ray14 and CheXpert. It was then tested on six external datasets from multiple independent institutions (labeled A-F) in a retrospective case-control design (data acquired between 2016 and 2019 from institutions A-E; institution F consisted of data from the MIMIC-CXR dataset). Performance on each dataset was evaluated by using area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUC) analysis, sensitivity, specificity, and positive and negative predictive values, with two radiologists in consensus being used as the reference standard. Patient and acquisition factors that influenced performance were analyzed.
RESULTS: The AUCs for pneumothorax detection for external institutions A-F were 0.91 (95% CI: 0.88, 0.94), 0.97 (95% CI: 0.94, 0.99), 0.91 (95% CI: 0.85, 0.97), 0.98 (95% CI: 0.96, 1.0), 0.97 (95% CI: 0.95, 0.99), and 0.92 (95% CI: 0.90, 0.95), respectively, compared with the internal test AUC of 0.93 (95% CI: 0.92, 0.93). The model had lower performance for small compared with large pneumothoraces (AUC, 0.88 [95% CI: 0.85, 0.91] vs AUC, 0.96 [95% CI: 0.95, 0.97]; P = .005). Model performance was not different when a chest tube was present or absent on the radiographs (AUC, 0.95 [95% CI: 0.92, 0.97] vs AUC, 0.94 [95% CI: 0.92, 0.05]; P > .99).
CONCLUSION: A deep learning model trained with a large volume of data on the task of pneumothorax detection was able to generalize well to multiple external datasets with patient demographics and technical parameters independent of the training data.Keywords: Thorax, Computer Applications-Detection/DiagnosisSee also commentary by Jacobson and Krupinski in this issue.Supplemental material is available for this article.©RSNA, 2021.
MATERIALS AND METHODS: In this retrospective study, a deep learning model was trained for pneumothorax detection by merging two large open-source chest radiograph datasets: ChestX-ray14 and CheXpert. It was then tested on six external datasets from multiple independent institutions (labeled A-F) in a retrospective case-control design (data acquired between 2016 and 2019 from institutions A-E; institution F consisted of data from the MIMIC-CXR dataset). Performance on each dataset was evaluated by using area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUC) analysis, sensitivity, specificity, and positive and negative predictive values, with two radiologists in consensus being used as the reference standard. Patient and acquisition factors that influenced performance were analyzed.
RESULTS: The AUCs for pneumothorax detection for external institutions A-F were 0.91 (95% CI: 0.88, 0.94), 0.97 (95% CI: 0.94, 0.99), 0.91 (95% CI: 0.85, 0.97), 0.98 (95% CI: 0.96, 1.0), 0.97 (95% CI: 0.95, 0.99), and 0.92 (95% CI: 0.90, 0.95), respectively, compared with the internal test AUC of 0.93 (95% CI: 0.92, 0.93). The model had lower performance for small compared with large pneumothoraces (AUC, 0.88 [95% CI: 0.85, 0.91] vs AUC, 0.96 [95% CI: 0.95, 0.97]; P = .005). Model performance was not different when a chest tube was present or absent on the radiographs (AUC, 0.95 [95% CI: 0.92, 0.97] vs AUC, 0.94 [95% CI: 0.92, 0.05]; P > .99).
CONCLUSION: A deep learning model trained with a large volume of data on the task of pneumothorax detection was able to generalize well to multiple external datasets with patient demographics and technical parameters independent of the training data.Keywords: Thorax, Computer Applications-Detection/DiagnosisSee also commentary by Jacobson and Krupinski in this issue.Supplemental material is available for this article.©RSNA, 2021.